Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM vs QVOL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
MPIM costs 0.12 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MPIM | QVOL |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026) | fell 12.5% (since May 12, 2026) |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, measured through ONEQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.82% |
| Net assets | not read by ETFIQ | $49m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.4.4 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −12.5%, total −6.7%, ONEQ −2.3%, −4.4 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ONEQ
−2.3%
QVOL
−6.7%
4.4 pts behind ONEQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.4 pts behind ONEQ
QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −12.5%, total −6.7%, ONEQ −2.3%, −4.4 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
ONEQ
−2.3%
QVOL
−6.7%
4.4 pts behind ONEQ
6.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QVOL since launch: paid 6.4%, price −12.5%, total −6.7%, ONEQ −2.3%, −4.4 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MPIM | QVOL | MPIM | QVOL | MPIM | QVOL |
| 3 months | −10.6% | −13.5% | 3.0% | 3.1% | not measured | −8.3 pts |
| 6 months | – | −8.8% | – | 6.2% | – | −4.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · QVOL May 2026 | −10.0% | −6.7% | 3.0% | 6.4% | not measured | −4.5 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
MPIM
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.
QVOL
Over the period from its first trade on May 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, QVOL paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.7%. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) returned −2.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.4 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MPIM against QVOL, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qvol
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). MPIM against QVOL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qvol
[MPIM against QVOL (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qvol)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
MPIM and QVOL both write options for income.
MPIM and QVOL
Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.
MPIM −10.6%, QVOL −13.5%: MPIM +2.9 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.