Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MAGY vs QRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.8%, though QRMI returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
11.8%QRMI cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year
+8.5%QRMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QRMI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MAGY 22.6QRMI 28.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS
QRMI13.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash13.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QRMI+8.5%13.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and QRMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in MAGYOnly in QRMI
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%NVIDIA CORP 8.49%
First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%APPLE INC 7.78%
MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%MICROSOFT CORP 5.81%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.02%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.33%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.00%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.25%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MAGY and QRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MAGYQRMIMAGYQRMIMAGYQRMI
3 months+3.7%+0.6%6.1%3.0%−3.9 pts+3.1 pts
6 months+8.1%+7.3%12.9%6.1%−12.7 pts−17.0 pts
1 year+1.8%+8.5%26.5%11.8%−9.4 pts−13.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+26.7%not published33.5%not published−71.5 pts
Since launch+25.6%+10.4%42.0%40.8%−37.5 pts−89.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MAGY and QRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillGlobal X
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized19.2%12.0%
Expense ratio0.99%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year26.5%11.8%
Price change, 1 year−25.3%−3.8%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%+8.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−9.4 pts−13.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age513 days1849 days
Net assets$102m$15m

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

QRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QRMI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MAGY or QRMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.8%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or QRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and QRMI returned +8.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QRMI returned more.
Which is cheaper, MAGY or QRMI?
MAGY charges 0.99% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGY against QRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against QRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-qrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources