Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LOCT vs RDVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year RDVI paid 8.8% of its price in cash against LOCT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

5.2%LOCT cash paid, 1 year
8.8%RDVI cash paid, 1 year
+5.4%LOCT total return, 1 year
+19.2%RDVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RDVI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LOCT 42.2RDVI 62.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LOCT11.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LOCT+5.4%5.2% as cash11.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LOCT+5.4%11.2 pts behind SPY
RDVI8 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8.8% of it arrived as cash8 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LOCT and RDVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LOCTOnly in RDVI
TREASURY BILL 98.30%Lam Research Corporation 2.31%
TREASURY BILL 0.43%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.30%
TREASURY BILL 0.43%The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.27%
TREASURY BILL 0.42%The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.22%
TREASURY BILL 0.42%GE Vernova Inc. 2.19%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.18%
KLA Corporation 2.16%
NVIDIA Corporation 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LOCT and RDVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LOCTRDVILOCTRDVILOCTRDVI
3 months+1.0%+0.3%1.3%2.1%−1.2 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+3.9%+15.1%2.6%4.6%−14.1 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+5.4%+19.2%5.2%8.8%−11.2 pts−8.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+69.2%not published29.6%not published+15.5 pts
Since launch+18.5%+101.2%16.5%41.0%−66.4 pts+32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LOCT and RDVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LOCT
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorFirst Trust
Strategybuffer with incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.2%8.8%
Expense ratio0.79%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year5.2%8.8%
Price change, 1 year+0.1%+9.6%
Total return, 1 year+5.4%+19.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+27.2%
Ahead or behind−11.2 pts−8.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1082 days1429 days
Net assets$11m$3.7bn

LOCT in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid monthly.

RDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDVI paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LOCT or RDVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 8.8%, so RDVI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LOCT or RDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, LOCT returned +5.4% and RDVI returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, LOCT or RDVI?
LOCT charges 0.79% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so RDVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LOCT against RDVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LOCT against RDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/loct-vs-rdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources