Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

LOCT vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its price in cash against LOCT’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LOCT and QLDY

Net assets: $11m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October, and $53m on Nov 3, 2026 for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF.

At a glance
5.2%
LOCT cash paid, 1 year
35.3%
QLDY cash paid, 1 year
+5.8%
LOCT total return, 1 year
+9.1%
QLDY total return, 1 year
LOCT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9 pts behind VOO
LOCT
+5.8%
VOO
+14.8%

9 pts behind VOO

LOCT over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price +0.4%, total +5.8%, VOO +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LOCT

+5.8%

5.2% of it arrived as cash

9 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

9 pts behind VOO

LOCT over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price +0.4%, total +5.8%, VOO +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LOCT

+5.8%

9 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LOCT over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price +0.4%, total +5.8%, VOO +14.8%, −9.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QLDY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.2 pts behind QQQ
QLDY
+9.1%
QQQ
+12.3%

3.2 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QLDY

+9.1%

35.3% of it arrived as cash

3.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.2 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QLDY

+9.1%

35.3% cash

3.2 pts behind QQQ

35.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LOCT costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; QLDY is 4.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LOCT vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureLOCTQLDY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+5.8%+9.1%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.4%fell 27.2%
Return of capital, issuer estimate35% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment0% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOONasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 9.0 ptsbehind by 3.2 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%1.04%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$11m$53m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · LOCT scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score65.6LOCT24.9QLDY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LOCT and QLDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LOCT QLDY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LOCT
Only in QLDY
Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 92.84%
United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 0.49%
Exchange Put Opt 11/26 28320 0.15%
Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05%
Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 11/26 28470 -0.24%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
Strategy buffer with income option income
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 5.8% 19.7%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.04%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.2% 35.3%
Price change, 1 year +0.4% −27.2%
Total return, 1 year +5.8% +9.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −9.0 pts −3.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 35% 0%
Age 3.1 years 1.1 years
Net assets, LOCT as of Nov 4, 2026 and QLDY as of Nov 3, 2026 $11m $53m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: LOCT vs QLDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowLOCTQLDYLOCTQLDYLOCTQLDY
3 months+1.2%−4.5%1.3%9.5%+1.3 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+2.4%−3.1%2.6%18.5%−2.6 pts−2.8 pts
1 year+5.8%+9.1%5.2%35.3%−9.0 pts−3.2 pts
3 years+17.9%–16.8%–−65.4 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: LOCT Oct 2023 · QLDY Sep 2025+19.3%+13.2%17.5%39.1%−67.1 pts−3.7 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LOCT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LOCT

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.8%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 35% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QLDY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.7%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LOCT or QLDY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting price in cash and QLDY paid 35.3%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LOCT or QLDY?
With every distribution reinvested, LOCT returned +5.8% and QLDY +9.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, LOCT or QLDY?
LOCT charges 0.79% a year and QLDY charges 1.04%, so LOCT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LOCT against QLDY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/loct-vs-qldy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.