Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

LJUL vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QUSA paid 14.6% of its price in cash against LJUL’s 5.2%, though LJUL returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LJUL and QUSA

Net assets: $9.0m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July, and $20m on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

At a glance
5.2%
LJUL cash paid, 1 year
14.6%
QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%
LJUL total return, 1 year
+1.9%
QUSA total return, 1 year
LJUL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.5 pts behind VOO
LJUL
+5.3%
VOO
+14.8%

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

5.2% of it arrived as cash

9.5 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

9.5 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QUSA · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 12.9 pts behind SPY
QUSA
+1.9%
SPY
+14.8%

12.9 pts behind SPY

QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

QUSA

+1.9%

14.6% cash

12.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

12.9 pts behind SPY

QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

QUSA

+1.9%

12.9 pts behind SPY

14.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LJUL costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; QUSA is 2.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LJUL vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureLJULQUSA
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+5.3%+1.9%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.0%fell 12.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOOS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.97%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$8.9m$20m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · LJUL scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score57.8LJUL21.9QUSA

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LJUL and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LJUL QUSA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LJUL
Only in QUSA
Apple Inc 7.27%
Microsoft Corp 6.27%
NVIDIA Corp 6.15%
Visa Inc 5.70%
Alphabet Inc 4.97%
Lam Research Corp 4.91%
Mastercard Inc 4.37%
Adobe Inc 4.17%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy buffer with income covered call
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 5.3% 15.4%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.2% 14.6%
Price change, 1 year 0.0% −12.3%
Total return, 1 year +5.3% +1.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −9.5 pts −12.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 40% 100%
Age 2.3 years 1.5 years
Net assets, LJUL as of Nov 4, 2026 and QUSA as of Nov 3, 2026 $9.0m $20m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: LJUL vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowLJULQUSALJULQUSALJULQUSA
3 months+1.1%−8.5%1.3%3.6%+1.3 pts−8.4 pts
6 months+2.8%−5.5%2.6%7.3%−2.3 pts−10.5 pts
1 year+5.3%+1.9%5.2%14.6%−9.5 pts−12.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: LJUL Jul 2024 · QUSA May 2025+14.0%−1.8%12.6%17.3%−30.5 pts−41.3 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LJUL and QUSA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LJUL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QUSA

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QUSA paid 14.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.4%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LJUL or QUSA?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 14.6%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LJUL or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, LJUL returned +5.3% and QUSA +1.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, LJUL or QUSA?
LJUL charges 0.79% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so LJUL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LJUL against QUSA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-qusa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.