Data as of Oct 30, 2026.
LJUL vs QQDH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
LJUL and QQDH both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LJUL and QQDHNet assets: $8.9m on Oct 30, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July, beside Tuttle Capital Innovation 100 Income AND Hedge ETF.
7.5 pts behind VOO
LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.4%, −7.5 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
VOO
+12.4%
LJUL
+4.9%
5.6% of it arrived as cash
7.5 pts behind VOO
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.5 pts behind VOO
LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.4%, −7.5 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
VOO
+12.4%
LJUL
+4.9%
7.5 pts behind VOO
5.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.9%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.4%, −7.5 pts. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
Data to Oct 30, 2026.Not measured
QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
QQDH
−2.6%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
QQDH
−2.6%
0.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QQDH since launch: paid 0.3%, price −2.9%, total −2.6%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Oct 30, 2026.
Data to Oct 30, 2026.Pair scorecard
LJUL costs 0.16 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LJUL | QQDH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.9% | not published |
| Price change | fell 0.9% (1 year) | fell 2.9% (since Oct 23, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.95% |
| Net assets | $8.9m | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Side by side
As of Oct 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LJUL | QQDH | LJUL | QQDH | LJUL | QQDH |
| 3 months | +1.2% | – | 1.3% | – | −0.3 pts | – |
| 6 months | +2.3% | – | 2.6% | – | −3.2 pts | – |
| 1 year | +4.9% | – | 5.6% | – | −7.5 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: LJUL Jul 2024 · QQDH Oct 2026 | +13.5% | −2.6% | 12.6% | 0.3% | −28.9 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
LJUL
Over the year to Oct 30, 2026, LJUL paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +12.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Oct 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
QQDH
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 23, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026, QQDH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.6%. At its price on Oct 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.9%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LJUL against QQDH, data as of Oct 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-qqdh
ETFIQ. (Oct 30, 2026). LJUL against QQDH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-qqdh
[LJUL against QQDH (ETFIQ, Oct 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-qqdh)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.