Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LAPR vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 5.9%, though LAPR returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April and VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

5.9%LAPR cash paid, 1 year
13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+6.1%LAPR total return, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LAPR scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LAPR 42.6QUSA 21.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LAPR10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%10.5 pts behind SPY
QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LAPR and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LAPROnly in QUSA
TREASURY BILL 94.62%Microsoft Corp 6.08%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Apple Inc 5.99%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%NVIDIA Corp 5.78%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Caterpillar Inc 4.91%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Broadcom Inc 4.70%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LAPR and QUSA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LAPRQUSALAPRQUSALAPRQUSA
3 months+1.3%−1.9%1.7%3.6%−0.9 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+3.8%+10.4%3.3%7.8%−14.2 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+6.1%+3.5%5.9%13.8%−10.5 pts−11.7 pts
Since launch+16.1%+4.9%13.8%15.1%−34.1 pts−25.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LAPR and QUSA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorVistaShares
Strategybuffer with incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.7%15.3%
Expense ratio0.79%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year5.9%13.8%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−11.0%
Total return, 1 year+6.1%+3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+15.2%
Ahead or behind−10.5 pts−11.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age900 days500 days
Net assets$11m$22m

LAPR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LAPR or QUSA?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LAPR or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, LAPR returned +6.1% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LAPR returned more.
Which is cheaper, LAPR or QUSA?
LAPR charges 0.79% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so LAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LAPR against QUSA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LAPR against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lapr-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources