Data as of .
KYLD vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
KYLD and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KYLD and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KYLD | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 12.96% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| TREASURY BILL 11.01% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| Global X Silver Miners ETF 7.09% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 6.38% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.21% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| Intel Corp 6.19% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc 5.97% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Teradyne Inc 5.77% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYLD | YMAG | KYLD | YMAG | KYLD | YMAG | |
| 3 months | −6.3% | +6.1% | 5.6% | 9.4% | −8.5 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +24.4% | +15.4% | 14.1% | 21.1% | +6.4 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +2.0% | +70.7% | 20.9% | 89.1% | −10.9 pts | −34.1 pts |
| KYLD Kurv High Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying weekly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Kurv | YieldMax |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 25.6% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 20.9% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −20.5% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +12.9% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 80% |
| Age | 322 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $49m | $297m |
KYLD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 31, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, KYLD paid 20.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.6%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KYLD or YMAG?
- KYLD charges 1.00% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so KYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KYLD against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.