Data as of .
KYLD vs SPUT: which paid, and which earned it?
KYLD and SPUT both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KYLD and SPUT hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KYLD | SPUT |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 12.96% | 49.24% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.17% | 1.60% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 6.21% | 0.47% |
| Intel Corp | 6.19% | 0.34% |
| AppLovin Corp | 5.32% | 0.09% |
| Howmet Aerospace Inc | 5.97% | 0.08% |
| Robinhood Markets Inc | 3.81% | 0.04% |
| Teradyne Inc | 5.77% | 0.04% |
| Vistra Corp | 4.71% | 0.04% |
| Reddit Inc | 4.15% | 0.02% |
| Only in KYLD | Only in SPUT |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 11.01% | NVIDIA Corp 3.85% |
| Global X Silver Miners ETF 7.09% | Apple Inc 3.22% |
| VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 6.38% | Microsoft Corp 2.47% |
| BWX Technologies Inc 5.38% | Amazon.com Inc 2.09% |
| Shopify Inc 3.43% | Alphabet Inc 1.84% |
| Hims & Hers Health Inc 3.19% | Alphabet Inc 1.59% |
| Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF 3.00% | Meta Platforms Inc 1.10% |
| TREASURY BILL 0.26% | Tesla Inc 0.91% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KYLD | SPUT | KYLD | SPUT | KYLD | SPUT | |
| 3 months | −6.3% | +2.4% | 5.6% | 1.1% | −8.5 pts | +0.1 pts |
| 6 months | +24.4% | +11.5% | 14.1% | 2.5% | +6.4 pts | −6.5 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +11.5% | not published | 5.2% | not published | −5.1 pts |
| Since launch | +2.0% | +22.4% | 20.9% | 8.5% | −10.9 pts | −15.6 pts |
| KYLD Kurv High Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying weekly | SPUT Innovator Equity Premium Income - Daily PutWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Kurv | Innovator |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 25.6% | 4.7% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 20.9% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −20.5% | +6.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) | +11.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +12.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.9 pts | −5.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | not published |
| Age | 322 days | 553 days |
| Net assets | $49m | $17m |
KYLD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 31, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, KYLD paid 20.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.6%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
SPUT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SPUT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KYLD or SPUT?
- KYLD charges 1.00% a year and SPUT charges 0.79%, so SPUT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KYLD against SPUT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kyld-vs-sput Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.