Data as of .
KNG vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year KNG paid 8.5% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KNG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KNG and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KNG | XIJN |
|---|---|---|
| US Dollar | -1.29% | 0.76% |
| Only in KNG | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson 1.85% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 100.51% |
| Nucor Corporation 1.85% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 3.76% |
| West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.77% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| Chubb Limited 1.74% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% |
| Becton, Dickinson and Company 1.72% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 1.72% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 1.71% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
| Walmart Inc. 1.71% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 04/15/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNG | XIJN | KNG | XIJN | KNG | XIJN | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.8% | 2.2% | 1.1% | −0.1 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +7.1% | +4.0% | 4.4% | 3.5% | −0.9 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +8.3% | +6.2% | 8.5% | 6.9% | −1.6 pts | −10.3 pts |
| 3 years | +24.0% | not published | 25.4% | not published | −4.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +101.5% | +16.6% | 59.4% | 14.7% | −15.2 pts | −27.4 pts |
| KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | First Trust |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.8% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.5% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.4% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.3% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +9.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.6 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 3097 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $3.3bn | $53m |
KNG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.3%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +9.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, KNG or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so KNG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, KNG or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, KNG returned +8.3% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so KNG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, KNG or XIJN?
- KNG charges 0.74% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so KNG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KNG against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kng-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.