Data as of .
KIQQ vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and MAGY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KIQQ | Only in MAGY |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% |
| NVIDIA CORP 8.90% | First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% |
| APPLE INC 8.20% | MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.50% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | MAGY | KIQQ | MAGY | KIQQ | MAGY | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | +3.7% | 1.9% | 6.1% | −0.7 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +8.1% | 4.5% | 12.9% | −12.3 pts | −12.7 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +1.8% | not published | 26.5% | not published | −9.4 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +25.6% | 5.8% | 42.0% | −9.9 pts | −37.5 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Roundhill |
| Strategy | buffer with income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 19.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 26.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −25.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +1.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | −9.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 254 days | 513 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $102m |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or MAGY?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so KIQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.