Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KIQQ vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
KIQQ and MAGY both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KIQQ and MAGY
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $2.4m for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF and $94m for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.
10.4 pts behind QQQ
KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+11.3%
KIQQ
+0.9%
10.4 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.4 pts behind QQQ
KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+11.3%
KIQQ
+0.9%
10.4 pts behind QQQ
6.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
KIQQ costs 0.20 points a year less; MAGY is far larger, $94m against $2.4m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | KIQQ | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −1.5% |
| Price change | fell 6.0% (since Jan 7, 2026) | fell 26.1% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 99% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.99% |
| Net assets | $2.4m | $94m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Jan 16, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 41 weekly returnsFrom Jan 2026 to Oct 2026, KIQQ returned more: +0.8% to −2.1%. KIQQ fell less at its worst: −8.5% to −13.1%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | KIQQ | MAGY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +0.8% | −2.1% | KIQQ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −6.1% | −20.9% | KIQQ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −8.5% | −13.1% | KIQQ | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 41 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | KIQQ | MAGY | KIQQ | MAGY | KIQQ | MAGY |
| 3 months | −3.7% | +4.0% | 1.7% | 5.4% | −0.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | −4.4% | +0.8% | 3.7% | 11.3% | −4.0 pts | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | −1.5% | – | 24.0% | – | −7.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: KIQQ Jan 2026 · MAGY Apr 2025 | +0.9% | +25.7% | 6.9% | 44.0% | −10.4 pts | −37.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for KIQQ.
KIQQ
Over the period from its first trade on Jan 7, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, KIQQ paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly. KraneShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KIQQ against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-magy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KIQQ against MAGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-magy
[KIQQ against MAGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-magy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.