Which paid more, JULJ or YYY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.4%, so YYY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULJ or YYY?

With every distribution reinvested, JULJ returned +5.4% and YYY +1.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, JULJ or YYY?

JULJ charges 0.79% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

JULJ vs YYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YYY paid 12.4% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.6%, though JULJ returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JULJ and YYY

Net assets: $14m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July, and $674m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify CEF High Income ETF.

JULJ on its own →YYY on its own →

At a glance

5.6%

JULJ cash paid, 1 year

12.4%

YYY cash paid, 1 year

+5.4%

JULJ total return, 1 year

+1.9%

YYY total return, 1 year

JULJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ

+5.4%

SPY

+14.8%

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

9.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

9.4 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

YYY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

YYY

+1.9%

none

Not measured

YYY over 1 year: paid 12.4%, price −10.3%, total +1.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

YYY

+1.9%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

YYY over 1 year: paid 12.4%, price −10.3%, total +1.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

YYY

+1.9%

12.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YYY over 1 year: paid 12.4%, price −10.3%, total +1.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULJ costs 2.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.5 points; YYY is far larger, $674m against $14m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULJ vs YYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	JULJ	YYY
Paid and earned
Measure	JULJ	YYY
Total return, 1 year	+5.4%	+1.9%
Price change, 1 year	fell 0.4%	fell 10.3%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment	18% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	JULJ	YYY
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	its own holdings
Cost and size
Measure	JULJ	YYY
Expense ratio	0.79%	3.23%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$14m	$674m
Holdings
Measure	JULJ	YYY
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, JULJ and YYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JULJ YYY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in JULJ

Only in YYY

abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund 3.64%

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund 3.31%

Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund/Closed-end Fund 3.31%

BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust 3.30%

PIMCO High Income Fund 3.06%

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp 3.04%

Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund 2.70%

abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund 2.66%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF · Income from closed-end funds on its own holdings, paying monthly

Issuer Innovator Amplify

Strategy defined income income from closed-end funds

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) YYY's own holdings (from its holdings of Nov 3, 2026)

Pays quarterly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 5.4% 13.8%

Expense ratio 0.79% 3.23%

Cash paid, 1 year 5.6% 12.4%

Price change, 1 year −0.4% −10.3%

Total return, 1 year +5.4% +1.9%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% not published

Ahead or behind −9.4 pts not available

Return of capital, latest estimate 39% 18%

Age 3.3 years 14.4 years

Net assets, JULJ as of Nov 4, 2026 and YYY as of Nov 3, 2026 $14m $674m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULJ vs YYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	JULJ	YYY	JULJ	YYY	JULJ	YYY
3 months	+1.3%	−4.9%	1.3%	3.2%	+1.5 pts	not measured
6 months	+2.6%	−4.1%	2.7%	6.2%	−2.4 pts	not measured
1 year	+5.4%	+1.9%	5.6%	12.4%	−9.4 pts	not measured
3 years	+18.6%	+35.2%	17.3%	38.6%	−64.3 pts	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: JULJ Jul 2023 · YYY Jun 2012	+21.3%	+114.4%	19.0%	113.6%	−58.5 pts	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

JULJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

YYY

No 1-year comparison: a quarter's holdings filing is missing from the year.

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YYY paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.8%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 18% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULJ or YYY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.4%, so YYY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULJ or YYY?: With every distribution reinvested, JULJ returned +5.4% and YYY +1.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULJ or YYY?: JULJ charges 0.79% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JULJ vs YMAG JULJ vs SIXH JULJ vs ULTY JULJ vs KYLD YYY vs OCTJ YYY vs QUSA YYY vs NLSI YYY vs SPIN

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →JULJ on its own →YYY on its own →JULJ dividend history →YYY dividend history →YYY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JULJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JULJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JULJ 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JULJ ↗

YYY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

YYY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

YYY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Amplify page for YYY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULJ against YYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-yyy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.