Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QUSA vs YYY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against YYY’s 12.1% and the two finished level on total return.

VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF and Amplify CEF High Income ETF.

13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
12.1%YYY cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year
+3.4%YYY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YYY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QUSA 21.4YYY 22.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL
YYY13.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%12.1% as cash13.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%YYY+3.4%13.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and YYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QUSAOnly in YYY
Microsoft Corp 6.08%abrdn Healthcare Investors 3.64%
Apple Inc 5.99%BlackRock Capital Allocation T 3.56%
NVIDIA Corp 5.78%Royce Small-Cap Trust Inc 3.55%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend F 3.53%
Caterpillar Inc 4.91%Tortoise Energy Infrastructure 3.38%
Broadcom Inc 4.70%BlackRock ESG Capital Allocati 3.31%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%DoubleLine Income Solutions Fu 3.22%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fu 3.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QUSA and YYY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QUSAYYYQUSAYYYQUSAYYY
3 months−1.9%−2.5%3.6%3.1%−3.6 pts−4.8 pts
6 months+10.4%+4.7%7.8%6.5%−4.3 pts−13.3 pts
1 year+3.5%+3.4%13.8%12.1%−11.7 pts−13.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+37.1%not published37.7%not published−41.3 pts
Since launch+4.9%+117.8%15.1%112.4%−25.8 pts−519.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QUSA and YYY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesAmplify
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxyS&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.3%13.3%
Expense ratio0.97%3.23%
Cash paid, 1 year13.8%12.1%
Price change, 1 year−11.0%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+3.5%+3.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+15.2%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.7 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age500 days5211 days
Net assets$22m$702m

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

YYY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YYY paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QUSA or YYY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.1%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QUSA or YYY?
With every distribution reinvested, QUSA returned +3.5% and YYY returned +3.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QUSA returned more.
Which is cheaper, QUSA or YYY?
QUSA charges 0.97% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUSA against YYY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against YYY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-yyy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources