Data as of .
JULH vs LJAN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year LJAN paid 4.9% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LJAN scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and LJAN hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JULH | LJAN |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 100.00% | 97.22% |
| Only in JULH | Only in LJAN |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULH | LJAN | JULH | LJAN | JULH | LJAN | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.3% | 1.1% | 1.2% | −0.4 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +4.0% | +4.8% | 2.7% | 2.5% | −14.0 pts | −13.2 pts |
| 1 year | +4.5% | +5.1% | 4.7% | 4.9% | −12.1 pts | −11.4 pts |
| 3 years | +20.7% | not published | 18.4% | not published | −57.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +22.7% | +16.1% | 18.6% | 13.9% | −55.9 pts | −50.4 pts |
| JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | LJAN Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | Innovator |
| Strategy | defined income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.4% | +0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.5% | +5.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −12.1 pts | −11.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1173 days | 990 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $12m |
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
LJAN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJAN paid 4.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JULH or LJAN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting price in cash and LJAN paid 4.9%, so LJAN paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or LJAN?
- With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.5% and LJAN returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LJAN returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JULH or LJAN?
- JULH charges 0.79% a year and LJAN charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against LJAN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-ljan Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.