Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LJAN vs OCTH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OCTH paid 6.3% of its price in cash against LJAN’s 4.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October.

4.9%LJAN cash paid, 1 year
6.3%OCTH cash paid, 1 year
+5.1%LJAN total return, 1 year
+6.7%OCTH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OCTH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LJAN 40.8OCTH 45.23.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LJAN11.4 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%4.9% as cash11.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LJAN+5.1%11.4 pts behind SPY
OCTH9.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%6.3% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%9.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LJAN and OCTH hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions LJAN and OCTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingLJANOCTH
TREASURY BILL97.22%98.41%
Only in each
Only in LJANOnly in OCTH
TREASURY BILL 0.40%TREASURY BILL 1.59%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%
TREASURY BILL 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LJAN and OCTH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LJANOCTHLJANOCTHLJANOCTH
3 months+1.3%+1.3%1.2%1.6%−1.0 pts−1.0 pts
6 months+4.8%+5.5%2.5%3.3%−13.2 pts−12.5 pts
1 year+5.1%+6.7%4.9%6.3%−11.4 pts−9.9 pts
Since launch+16.1%+22.9%13.9%19.1%−50.4 pts−61.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LJAN and OCTH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LJAN
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
Strategybuffer with incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized4.8%6.4%
Expense ratio0.79%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year4.9%6.3%
Price change, 1 year+0.1%0.0%
Total return, 1 year+5.1%+6.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.4 pts−9.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age990 days1082 days
Net assets$12m$16m

LJAN in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJAN paid 4.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.8%, paid monthly.

OCTH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LJAN or OCTH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LJAN paid 4.9% of its starting price in cash and OCTH paid 6.3%, so OCTH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LJAN or OCTH?
With every distribution reinvested, LJAN returned +5.1% and OCTH returned +6.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OCTH returned more.
Which is cheaper, LJAN or OCTH?
LJAN charges 0.79% a year and OCTH charges 0.79%, so LJAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LJAN against OCTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LJAN against OCTH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljan-vs-octh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources