Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JANJ vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its price in cash against JANJ’s 5.0% and the two finished level on total return.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JANJ and JULJ

Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $14m for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January and $14m for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

At a glance
5.0%
JANJ cash paid, 1 year
5.6%
JULJ cash paid, 1 year
+5.2%
JANJ total return, 1 year
+5.4%
JULJ total return, 1 year
JANJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.6 pts behind SPY
JANJ
+5.2%
SPY
+14.8%

9.6 pts behind SPY

JANJ over 1 year: paid 5.0%, price +0.1%, total +5.2%, SPY +14.8%, −9.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANJ

+5.2%

5.0% of it arrived as cash

9.6 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.6 pts behind SPY

JANJ over 1 year: paid 5.0%, price +0.1%, total +5.2%, SPY +14.8%, −9.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JANJ

+5.2%

9.6 pts behind SPY

5.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JANJ over 1 year: paid 5.0%, price +0.1%, total +5.2%, SPY +14.8%, −9.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JULJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ
+5.4%
SPY
+14.8%

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

9.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

9.4 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.79% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JANJ vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJANJJULJ
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+5.2%+5.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.1%fell 0.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate46% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.79%
Net assets$14m$14m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JANJ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score59.6JANJ54.2JULJ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JANJ and JULJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JANJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Strategy defined income defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays quarterly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 5.0% 5.4%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.0% 5.6%
Price change, 1 year +0.1% −0.4%
Total return, 1 year +5.2% +5.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −9.6 pts −9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 46% 39%
Age 2.8 years 3.3 years
Net assets $14m $14m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JANJ vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJANJJULJJANJJULJJANJJULJ
3 months+1.1%+1.3%1.2%1.3%+1.3 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+2.6%+2.6%2.5%2.7%−2.4 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+5.2%+5.4%5.0%5.6%−9.5 pts−9.4 pts
3 years–+18.6%–17.3%–−64.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JANJ Jan 2024 · JULJ Jul 2023+16.7%+21.3%14.5%19.0%−50.9 pts−58.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JANJ and JULJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JANJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 46% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

JULJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANJ or JULJ?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.6%, so JULJ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANJ or JULJ?
With every distribution reinvested, JANJ returned +5.2% and JULJ +5.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JANJ or JULJ?
JANJ and JULJ both charge 0.79% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JANJ against JULJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janj-vs-julj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.