Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JANJ vs JULJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year JULJ paid 5.5% of its price in cash against JANJ’s 5.0% and the two finished level on total return.

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

5.0%JANJ cash paid, 1 year
5.5%JULJ cash paid, 1 year
+5.1%JANJ total return, 1 year
+5.1%JULJ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JANJ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JANJ 39.6JULJ 36.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JANJ11.4 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JANJ+5.1%5.0% of it arrived as cash11.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JANJ+5.1%11.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ11.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%5.5% of it arrived as cash11.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%11.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JANJ and JULJ hold 98% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions JANJ and JULJ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingJANJJULJ
TREASURY BILL97.55%100.00%
Only in each
Only in JANJOnly in JULJ
TREASURY BILL 1.23%
TREASURY BILL 1.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JANJ and JULJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JANJJULJJANJJULJJANJJULJ
3 months+1.3%+1.5%1.2%1.3%−0.9 pts−0.7 pts
6 months+5.0%+3.1%2.5%2.6%−13.0 pts−14.9 pts
1 year+5.1%+5.1%5.0%5.5%−11.4 pts−11.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+18.8%not published17.4%not published−59.6 pts
Since launch+15.9%+20.4%13.2%17.6%−50.5 pts−58.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JANJ and JULJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JANJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - January
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
Strategydefined incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized5.0%5.2%
Expense ratio0.79%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year5.0%5.5%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−0.6%
Total return, 1 year+5.1%+5.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.4 pts−11.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age990 days1173 days
Net assets$14m$14m

JANJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid quarterly.

JULJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULJ paid 5.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANJ or JULJ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANJ paid 5.0% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.5%, so JULJ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANJ or JULJ?
With every distribution reinvested, JANJ returned +5.1% and JULJ returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JANJ returned more.
Which is cheaper, JANJ or JULJ?
JANJ charges 0.79% a year and JULJ charges 0.79%, so JANJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JANJ against JULJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANJ against JULJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janj-vs-julj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources