Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JANH vs QQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against JANH’s 6.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January and NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

6.1%JANH cash paid, 1 year
15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%JANH total return, 1 year
+18.5%QQQI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JANH 44.6QQQI 54.93.8, the lowest in this set97.7, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JANH11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 21, 2026
SPY+17.8%JANH+6.5%6.1% as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.8%JANH+6.5%11.3 pts behind SPY
QQQI6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 21, 2026
QQQ+24.4%QQQI+18.5%15.2% of it arrived as cash6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+24.4%QQQI+18.5%15.2% cash6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and QQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JANHOnly in QQQI
TREASURY BILL 96.95%NVIDIA Corp 8.60%
TREASURY BILL 1.53%Apple Inc 7.70%
TREASURY BILL 1.52%Microsoft Corp 5.82%
Micron Technology Inc 5.06%
Amazon.com Inc 4.34%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.33%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.42%
Alphabet Inc 3.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 22, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JANH and QQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JANHQQQIJANHQQQIJANHQQQI
3 months+1.8%+1.4%1.6%3.4%−2.4 pts+0.8 pts
6 months+6.3%+17.8%3.2%7.6%−12.3 pts−8.6 pts
1 year+6.5%+18.5%6.1%15.2%−11.3 pts−6.0 pts
Since launch+19.9%+63.0%16.1%39.9%−49.1 pts−13.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JANH and QQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorNEOS
Strategydefined incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.2%13.7%
Expense ratio0.79%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year6.1%15.2%
Price change, 1 year+0.1%+1.7%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+18.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.8%+24.4%
Ahead or behind−11.3 pts−6.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published98%
Age993 days965 days
Net assets$12m$14.8bn

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 21, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 21, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly.

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 21, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +24.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.0 pts. At its price on Sep 21, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JANH or QQQI?
Over the year to Sep 21, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 15.2%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JANH or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, JANH returned +6.5% and QQQI returned +18.5% over the year to Sep 21, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, JANH or QQQI?
JANH charges 0.79% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JANH against QQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANH against QQQI, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-qqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

Other forms
Plain
ETFIQ, JANH against QQQI, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-qqqi
APA
ETFIQ. (Sep 21, 2026). JANH against QQQI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-qqqi
Markdown
[JANH against QQQI (ETFIQ, Sep 21, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-qqqi)

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources