Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JANH vs JUDO: which paid, and which earned it?

JANH and JUDO both write options for income.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January and Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF.

6.1%JANH cash paid, 1 year
2.6%JUDO cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%JANH total return, 1 year
+14.7%JUDO total return, 1 year
JANH10.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JANH+6.5%6.1% of it arrived as cash10.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JANH+6.5%10.1 pts behind SPY
JUDO1.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%2.6% as cash1.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%1.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JANH and JUDO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JANHOnly in JUDO
TREASURY BILL 96.95%NVIDIA Corp. 8.32%
TREASURY BILL 1.53%Alphabet, Inc. 7.49%
TREASURY BILL 1.52%Microsoft Corp. 6.00%
Amazon.com, Inc. 5.20%
Apple, Inc. 4.88%
Broadcom, Inc. 3.92%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.30%
Eli Lilly & Co. 2.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JANH and JUDO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JANHJUDOJANHJUDOJANHJUDO
3 months+1.6%+1.8%1.6%1.5%−0.6 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+6.9%not published3.2%not published−11.1 ptsnot published
1 year+6.5%not published6.1%not published−10.1 ptsnot published
Since launch+19.8%+14.7%16.1%2.6%−46.6 pts−1.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JANH and JUDO on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
JUDO
Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorJanus Henderson
Strategydefined incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.2%6.4%
Expense ratio0.79%0.55%
Cash paid, 1 year6.1%2.6% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)
Price change, 1 year0.0%+12.1%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+14.7% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−10.1 pts−1.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age990 days177 days
Net assets$14m$7m

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JANH paid 6.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.2%, paid quarterly.

JUDO in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, JUDO paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JANH or JUDO?
JANH charges 0.79% a year and JUDO charges 0.55%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JANH against JUDO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JANH against JUDO, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/janh-vs-judo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources