Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JUDO vs OCTH: which paid, and which earned it?

JUDO and OCTH both write options for income.

Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October.

2.6%JUDO cash paid, 1 year
6.3%OCTH cash paid, 1 year
+14.7%JUDO total return, 1 year
+6.7%OCTH total return, 1 year
JUDO1.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%2.6% as cash1.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JUDO+14.7%1.8 pts behind SPY
OCTH9.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%6.3% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTH+6.7%9.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JUDO and OCTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JUDOOnly in OCTH
NVIDIA Corp. 8.32%TREASURY BILL 98.41%
Alphabet, Inc. 7.49%TREASURY BILL 1.59%
Microsoft Corp. 6.00%
Amazon.com, Inc. 5.20%
Apple, Inc. 4.88%
Broadcom, Inc. 3.92%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.30%
Eli Lilly & Co. 2.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JUDO and OCTH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JUDOOCTHJUDOOCTHJUDOOCTH
3 months+1.8%+1.3%1.5%1.6%−0.5 pts−1.0 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.5%not published3.3%not published−12.5 pts
1 yearnot published+6.7%not published6.3%not published−9.9 pts
Since launch+14.7%+22.9%2.6%19.1%−1.8 pts−61.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JUDO and OCTH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JUDO
Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
OCTH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerJanus HendersonInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized6.4%6.4%
Expense ratio0.55%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year2.6% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)6.3%
Price change, 1 year+12.1%0.0%
Total return, 1 year+14.7% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026)+6.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−1.8 pts−9.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age177 days1082 days
Net assets$7m$16m

JUDO in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, JUDO paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.

OCTH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JUDO or OCTH?
JUDO charges 0.55% a year and OCTH charges 0.79%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JUDO against OCTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JUDO against OCTH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/judo-vs-octh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources