Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ISPY vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLG paid 16.7% of its price in cash against ISPY’s 6.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ISPY and QYLG

Net assets: $1.2bn on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF, and $183m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

At a glance
6.2%
ISPY cash paid, 1 year
16.7%
QYLG cash paid, 1 year
+11.3%
ISPY total return, 1 year
+14.4%
QYLG total return, 1 year
ISPY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.5 pts behind SPY
ISPY
+11.3%
SPY
+14.8%

3.5 pts behind SPY

ISPY over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +4.8%, total +11.3%, SPY +14.8%, −3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ISPY

+11.3%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

3.5 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.5 pts behind SPY

ISPY over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +4.8%, total +11.3%, SPY +14.8%, −3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ISPY

+11.3%

3.5 pts behind SPY

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ISPY over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price +4.8%, total +11.3%, SPY +14.8%, −3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLG
+14.4%
QQQ
+12.3%

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLG

+14.4%

16.7% of it arrived as cash

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QYLG

+14.4%

16.7% as cash

2.1 pts ahead of QQQ

16.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QYLG costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; ISPY is 6.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ISPY vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureISPYQYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+14.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 4.8%fell 3.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate87% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.55%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$1.2bn$183m
Holdings
Holdings in common46%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · ISPY scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score83.5ISPY49.4QYLG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Dec 29, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 148 weekly returns
ISPY QYLG
Return
Total return edge QYLG +49.2% +58.7%
Annualized edge QYLG +15.1% +17.6%
Price return edge ISPY +17.0% −0.3%
Risk
Volatility edge ISPY 12.8% 15.3%
Max drawdown edge ISPY −15.6% −19.3%
Downside capture 96.6% 84.8%
Beta 0.89 0.76
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QYLG (slight) 0.82 0.85
Sortino edge QYLG (slight) 1.19 1.26
Treynor 0.118 0.136
Calmar edge ISPY (slight) 0.97 0.91
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.0% a year −0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.26 −0.60
Information ratio −1.16 −0.72
Tracking error 3.1% 6.1%

Each against its own benchmark: ISPY against SPY, Dec 29, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026; QYLG against QQQ, Oct 2, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Dec 2023 to Oct 2026, QYLG returned more: +58.7% to +49.2%. ISPY swung less: 12.8% to 15.3%. ISPY fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −19.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ISPY vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureISPYQYLGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+49.2%+58.7%QYLGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.1%+17.6%QYLGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+17.0%−0.3%ISPYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.8%15.3%ISPYSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.8%10.3%ISPYLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−15.6%−19.3%ISPYDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture85.6%63.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture96.6%84.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.890.76Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.96Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.820.85QYLG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.191.26QYLG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1180.136Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.970.91ISPY (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYQQQThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.0% a year−0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.26−0.60Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−5.1% to +1.1%−3.6% to +1.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−1.16−0.72Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error3.1%6.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 148 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

46%

By the books each fund has filed, ISPY and QYLG hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

46% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ISPY QYLG
NVIDIA Corp. 6.80% 8.13%
Apple, Inc. 5.92% 7.59%
Microsoft Corp. 4.80% 5.78%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.24% 4.89%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.53% 3.47%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.23% 3.09%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.02% 3.25%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.60% 2.76%
Micron Technology, Inc. 1.38% 4.29%
Tesla, Inc. 1.32% 2.60%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.98% 3.59%
Walmart, Inc. 0.58% 2.50%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ISPY
JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.22%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.18%
Eli Lilly & Co. 1.16%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 0.85%
Johnson & Johnson 0.81%
Visa, Inc. 0.80%
Mastercard, Inc. 0.60%
AbbVie, Inc. 0.58%
Only in QYLG
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.96%
ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
SHOPIFY INC. 0.66%
ARM Holdings PLC 0.47%
MercadoLibre, Inc. 0.44%
PDD Holdings Inc. 0.27%
Astera Labs Inc 0.24%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC 0.24%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ISPY ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF · Option income on SPY, paying monthly QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.0% 7.1%
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.2% 16.7%
Price change, 1 year +4.8% −3.9%
Total return, 1 year +11.3% +14.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +12.3%
Ahead or behind −3.5 pts +2.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 87% 93%
Age 2.9 years 6.1 years
Net assets, ISPY as of Nov 4, 2026 and QYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 $1.2bn $183m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ISPY vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowISPYQYLGISPYQYLGISPYQYLG
3 months−0.5%−0.8%1.5%1.6%−0.3 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+3.8%+2.5%3.1%4.0%−1.2 pts+2.8 pts
1 year+11.3%+14.4%6.2%16.7%−3.5 pts+2.1 pts
3 years–+72.0%–52.1%–−19.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ISPY Dec 2023 · QYLG Sep 2020+54.0%+116.2%27.1%76.4%−15.1 pts−46.8 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ISPY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ISPY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISPY paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.0%, paid monthly. ProShares estimates that 87% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLG paid 16.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ISPY or QYLG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ISPY paid 6.2% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 16.7%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ISPY or QYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, ISPY returned +11.3% and QYLG +14.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ISPY or QYLG?
ISPY charges 0.55% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ISPY against QYLG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ispy-vs-qylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.