Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HYTI vs LQTI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year HYTI paid 9.9% of its price in cash against LQTI’s 8.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF.

9.9%HYTI cash paid, 1 year
8.5%LQTI cash paid, 1 year
+3.2%HYTI total return, 1 year
−1.4%LQTI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: HYTI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

HYTI 55LQTI 50.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

HYTI0.6 pts ahead of HYG · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
HYG+2.6%HYTI+3.2%9.9% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts ahead of HYGTotal return, distributions reinvestedHYG+2.6%HYTI+3.2%9.9% cash0.6 pts ahead of HYG
LQTI0.6 pts ahead of LQD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
LQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQDTotal return, distributions reinvestedLQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HYTI and LQTI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HYTI and LQTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHYTILQTI
US Dollar0.73%0.83%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/20260.59%0.43%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/20260.60%0.43%
Only in each
Only in HYTIOnly in LQTI
2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF C 0.79 98.16%2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF C 1.06 98.40%
2026-09-25 iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF C 78.52 -0.08%2026-09-25 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF C 104.69 -0.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

HYTI and LQTI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
HYTILQTIHYTILQTIHYTILQTI
3 months−0.2%−2.5%2.5%2.2%+0.2 pts+0.4 pts
6 months+2.6%−0.2%5.1%4.4%+0.1 pts+0.3 pts
1 year+3.2%−1.4%9.9%8.5%+0.6 pts+0.6 pts
Since launch+8.8%+4.7%15.4%13.4%+0.7 pts+0.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HYTI and LQTI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
Option income on HYG, paying monthly
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
Option income on LQD, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkUS high yield bonds (HYG), used as the proxyUS investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized10.4%9.2%
Expense ratio0.65%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year9.9%8.5%
Price change, 1 year−6.8%−9.7%
Total return, 1 year+3.2%−1.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+2.6%−2.0%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts+0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age582 days582 days
Net assets$94m$242m

HYTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, HYTI paid 9.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.2%. US high yield bonds (HYG), used as the proxy returned +2.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly.

LQTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQTI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, HYTI or LQTI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, HYTI paid 9.9% of its starting price in cash and LQTI paid 8.5%, so HYTI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, HYTI or LQTI?
With every distribution reinvested, HYTI returned +3.2% and LQTI returned −1.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so HYTI returned more.
Which is cheaper, HYTI or LQTI?
HYTI charges 0.65% a year and LQTI charges 0.65%, so HYTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HYTI against LQTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYTI against LQTI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hyti-vs-lqti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources