Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

HYBL vs LQTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LQTI paid 8.6% of its price in cash against HYBL’s 6.9%, though HYBL returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about HYBL and LQTI

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $584m for State Street Blackstone High Income ETF and $185m for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF.

At a glance
6.9%
HYBL cash paid, 1 year
8.6%
LQTI cash paid, 1 year
+3.5%
HYBL total return, 1 year
−0.6%
LQTI total return, 1 year
HYBL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
HYBL
+3.5%
none

Not measured

HYBL over 1 year: paid 6.9%, price −3.4%, total +3.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

HYBL

+3.5%

6.9% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

HYBL over 1 year: paid 6.9%, price −3.4%, total +3.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

HYBL

+3.5%

6.9% as cash

6.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. HYBL over 1 year: paid 6.9%, price −3.4%, total +3.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQTI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with LQD
LQTI
−0.6%
LQD
−1.1%

About even with LQD

LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

LQD

−1.1%

LQTI

−0.6%

about even with LQD

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with LQD

LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

LQD

−1.1%

LQTI

−0.6%

about even with LQD

8.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LQTI costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points; HYBL is 3.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

HYBL vs LQTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureHYBLLQTI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+3.5%−0.6%
Price change, 1 yearfell 3.4%fell 9.1%
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedUS investment grade bonds, measured through LQD
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.65%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$584m$185m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 21, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 88 weekly returns
HYBL LQTI
Return
Total return edge HYBL +8.4% +4.2%
Annualized edge HYBL +4.9% +2.5%
Price return edge HYBL −3.7% −9.8%
Risk
Volatility edge HYBL 3.5% 5.5%
Max drawdown edge HYBL −3.4% −5.3%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge HYBL 0.24 −0.26
Sortino edge HYBL 0.31 −0.32
Calmar edge HYBL 1.43 0.46
Reading

From Feb 2025 to Oct 2026, HYBL returned more: +8.4% to +4.2%. HYBL swung less: 3.5% to 5.5%. HYBL fell less at its worst: −3.4% to −5.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: HYBL vs LQTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureHYBLLQTIEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+8.4%+4.2%HYBLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+4.9%+2.5%HYBLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−3.7%−9.8%HYBLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility3.5%5.5%HYBLSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation2.7%4.4%HYBLLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−3.4%−5.3%HYBLDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.24−0.26HYBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.31−0.32HYBLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar1.430.46HYBLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 88 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, HYBL and LQTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first HYBL LQTI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in HYBL
Finastra USA Inc aka Misys/Almonde Inc. 09/15/2032 0.98%
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF 0.98%
Nissan Motor Co Ltd 4.81% 09/17/2030 0.88%
Neptune Bidco US Inc aka Nielsen/Nielsen Holdings 02/03/2033 0.80%
McAfee Corp 03/01/2029 0.80%
Sword Purchaser LLC aka Sealed Air 04/09/2033 0.78%
Michaels Cos Inc/The 03/15/2033 0.75%
Hopper Merger Sub Inc aka Hologic 04/07/2033 0.75%
Only in LQTI
2027-01-29 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF C 1.04 97.53%
2026-11-06 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF C 103.84 -0.06%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

HYBL State Street Blackstone High Income ETF · Income from senior loans and bonds, paying monthly LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF · Option income on LQD, paying monthly
Strategy income from senior loans and bonds option income
Benchmark none US investment grade bonds (LQD)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 7.4% 9.2%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.9% 8.6%
Price change, 1 year −3.4% −9.1%
Total return, 1 year +3.5% −0.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published −1.1%
Ahead or behind not available +0.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 4.7 years 1.7 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $584m $185m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: HYBL vs LQTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowHYBLLQTIHYBLLQTIHYBLLQTI
3 months−0.1%−0.4%1.8%2.2%not measured+0.4 pts
6 months+0.9%−1.7%3.5%4.4%not measured+0.3 pts
1 year+3.5%−0.6%6.9%8.6%not measured+0.5 pts
3 years+24.7%–23.1%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: HYBL Feb 2022 · LQTI Feb 2025+27.8%+5.4%31.7%14.8%not measured+0.1 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

HYBL and LQTI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
HYBL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HYBL paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.4%, paid monthly.

LQTI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LQTI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −1.1% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, HYBL or LQTI?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, HYBL paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and LQTI paid 8.6%, so LQTI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, HYBL or LQTI?
With every distribution reinvested, HYBL returned +3.5% and LQTI −0.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, HYBL or LQTI?
HYBL charges 0.70% a year and LQTI charges 0.65%, so LQTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, HYBL against LQTI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hybl-vs-lqti

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.