Data as of .
HEMI vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and OMAH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and OMAH hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | HEMI | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 5.86% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet Inc | 7.69% | 4.57% |
| Chubb Ltd | 0.95% | 4.49% |
| Only in HEMI | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 9.11% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.73% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.72% | Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.02% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.66% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% | Chevron Corp 4.75% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.13% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Mastercard Inc 2.04% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | OMAH | HEMI | OMAH | HEMI | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +1.7% | 2.2% | 3.7% | −1.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +8.8% | 4.9% | 7.7% | −4.5 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +14.6% | 6.0% | 21.4% | −3.4 pts | +12.4 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 275 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $1.1bn |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or OMAH?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.