Which is cheaper, JUDO or OMAH?

JUDO charges 0.55% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

JUDO vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

JUDO and OMAH both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

Net assets: $7.0m on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

JUDO on its own →OMAH on its own →

At a glance

3.8%

JUDO cash paid, since launch, Mar 25, 2026

14.7%

OMAH cash paid, 1 year

+16.1%

JUDO total return, since launch, Mar 25, 2026

+13.5%

OMAH total return, 1 year

JUDO · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

JUDO

+16.1%

none

Not measured

JUDO since launch: paid 3.8%, price +12.2%, total +16.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JUDO

+16.1%

3.8% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

JUDO since launch: paid 3.8%, price +12.2%, total +16.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JUDO

+16.1%

3.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JUDO since launch: paid 3.8%, price +12.2%, total +16.1%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH

+13.5%

SPY

+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JUDO costs 0.43 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JUDO vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	JUDO	OMAH
Paid and earned
Measure	JUDO	OMAH
Total return, 1 year	not published	+13.5%
Price change	rose 2.7% (6 months)	fell 2.4% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate		100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	JUDO	OMAH
Benchmark	its own stocks	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Against its benchmark, same days	ahead by 0.6 pts	behind by 1.3 pts
Cost and size
Measure	JUDO	OMAH
Expense ratio	0.55%	0.98%
Net assets, JUDO as of Jul 31, 2026 and OMAH as of Nov 3, 2026	$7.0m	$1.1bn
Holdings
Measure	JUDO	OMAH
Holdings in common	13%

Method

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, JUDO and OMAH hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JUDO OMAH

Apple, Inc. 4.38% 10.43%

Alphabet, Inc. 6.79% 3.58%

American Express Co. 1.49% 6.64%

Chevron Corp. 1.37% 4.66%

Coca-Cola Co. (The) 1.35% 5.08%

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 0.85% 4.38%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in JUDO

NVIDIA Corp. 7.84%

Microsoft Corp. 6.64%

Amazon.com, Inc. 5.17%

Broadcom, Inc. 3.56%

JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.31%

Eli Lilly & Co. 2.07%

Micron Technology, Inc. 1.99%

Mastercard, Inc. 1.72%

Only in OMAH

Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%

Kroger Co 5.21%

Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%

VeriSign Inc 4.86%

Moody's Corp 4.72%

DAVITA INC 4.71%

Chubb Ltd 4.67%

Kraft Heinz Co 4.40%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JUDO Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF · Covered call on its own stocks, paying monthly OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer Janus Henderson VistaShares

Strategy covered call covered call

Benchmark JUDO's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jul 31, 2026) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 6.4% 15.0%

Expense ratio 0.55% 0.98%

Cash paid, 1 year 3.8% (since launch, Mar 25, 2026) 14.7%

Price change, 1 year +12.2% (since launch, Mar 25, 2026) −2.4%

Total return, 1 year +16.1% (since launch, Mar 25, 2026) +13.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available −1.3 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%

Age 224 days 1.7 years

Net assets, JUDO as of Jul 31, 2026 and OMAH as of Nov 3, 2026 $7.0m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JUDO vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	JUDO	OMAH	JUDO	OMAH	JUDO	OMAH
3 months	−1.2%	+2.5%	1.6%	3.7%	+0.5 pts	+2.6 pts
6 months	+5.8%	+6.2%	3.1%	7.4%	+0.6 pts	+1.2 pts
1 year	–	+13.5%	–	14.7%	–	−1.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JUDO Mar 2026 · OMAH Mar 2025	+16.1%	+19.2%	3.8%	23.7%	not measured	−14.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

JUDO

JUDO's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jul 31, 2026) returned +5.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts.

Over the 6 months to Nov 4, 2026, JUDO paid 3.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, JUDO or OMAH?: JUDO charges 0.55% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JUDO vs ROCY JUDO vs BALI JUDO vs KHPI JUDO vs XYLD OMAH vs RNTY OMAH vs CVRD OMAH vs SCEP OMAH vs TCAL

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →JUDO on its own →OMAH on its own →JUDO dividend history →JUDO holdings →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JUDO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JUDO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Janus Henderson website ↗

OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

VistaShares page for OMAH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JUDO against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/judo-vs-omah

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.