Data as of .
JUDO vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
JUDO and OMAH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JUDO and OMAH hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JUDO | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. | 4.88% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 7.49% | 4.54% |
| Chevron Corp. | 1.50% | 4.75% |
| American Express Co. | 1.32% | 6.57% |
| Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 1.22% | 4.94% |
| Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 0.50% | 4.13% |
| Only in JUDO | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 8.32% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| Microsoft Corp. 6.00% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 5.20% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Broadcom, Inc. 3.92% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.30% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. 2.30% | Alphabet Inc 4.57% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 1.90% | Chubb Ltd 4.49% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 1.75% | Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUDO | OMAH | JUDO | OMAH | JUDO | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.7% | 1.5% | 3.7% | −0.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +8.8% | not published | 7.7% | not published | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +14.7% | +14.6% | 2.6% | 21.4% | −1.8 pts | +12.4 pts |
| JUDO Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Janus Henderson | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.4% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 2.6% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026) | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.1% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.7% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026) | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.8 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 177 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $1.1bn |
JUDO in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, JUDO paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, JUDO or OMAH?
- JUDO charges 0.55% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JUDO against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/judo-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.