Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
HAKY vs MLPD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
HAKY and MLPD both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about HAKY and MLPD
Net assets: $14m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF, and $26m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF.
16.2 pts behind HACK
HAKY since launch: paid 14.2%, price +21.4%, total +38.1%, HACK +54.3%, −16.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HACK
+54.3%
HAKY
+38.1%
14.2% as cash
16.2 pts behind HACK
Total return, distributions reinvested
16.2 pts behind HACK
HAKY since launch: paid 14.2%, price +21.4%, total +38.1%, HACK +54.3%, −16.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
HACK
+54.3%
HAKY
+38.1%
16.2 pts behind HACK
14.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. HAKY since launch: paid 14.2%, price +21.4%, total +38.1%, HACK +54.3%, −16.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% as cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MLPD
+15.4%
14.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +54.3%. MLPD over 1 year: paid 14.1%, price +0.6%, total +15.4%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Both charts share one scale, 0 to +54.3%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MLPD costs 0.05 points a year less; MLPD is 2.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | HAKY | MLPD |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +15.4% |
| Price change | rose 21.4% (since Jan 21, 2026) | rose 0.6% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Cybersecurity, measured through HACK | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $11m | $26m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Jan 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 39 weekly returnsFrom Jan 2026 to Oct 2026, HAKY returned more: +43.6% to +7.3%. MLPD fell less at its worst: −3.3% to −11.2%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | HAKY | MLPD | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +43.6% | +7.3% | HAKY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | +26.2% | −1.8% | HAKY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −11.2% | −3.3% | MLPD | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 39 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, HAKY and MLPD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | HAKY | MLPD | HAKY | MLPD | HAKY | MLPD |
| 3 months | +1.1% | +3.6% | 3.9% | 3.1% | −3.2 pts | not measured |
| 6 months | +32.7% | +3.4% | 10.0% | 6.0% | −11.3 pts | not measured |
| 1 year | – | +15.4% | – | 14.1% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: HAKY Jan 2026 · MLPD May 2024 | +38.1% | +32.7% | 14.2% | 30.2% | −16.2 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for HAKY.
HAKY
Over the period from its first trade on Jan 21, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, HAKY paid 14.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 21.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +38.1%. Cybersecurity (HACK) returned +54.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.8%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MLPD
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MLPD paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.4%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, HAKY against MLPD, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/haky-vs-mlpd
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). HAKY against MLPD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/haky-vs-mlpd
[HAKY against MLPD (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/haky-vs-mlpd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.