Data as of .
HAKY vs MLPD: which paid, and which earned it?
HAKY and MLPD both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HAKY and MLPD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HAKY | Only in MLPD |
|---|---|
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 9.19% | GLOBAL X MLP & ENERGY INFRAS 102.10% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc 8.56% | CASH 1.05% |
| Okta Inc 6.69% | OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -1.02% |
| Fortinet Inc 6.55% | 2MLPX US 10/16/2026 C74 -2.13% |
| Cloudflare Inc 5.55% | |
| Rubrik Inc 5.43% | |
| Cisco Systems Inc 5.35% | |
| Broadcom Inc 5.12% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAKY | MLPD | HAKY | MLPD | HAKY | MLPD | |
| 3 months | +18.3% | +4.2% | 4.5% | 3.0% | −5.3 pts | −16.2 pts |
| 6 months | +43.3% | +4.1% | 10.1% | 5.7% | −11.8 pts | −5.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +12.0% | not published | 13.3% | not published | −35.8 pts |
| Since launch | +39.2% | +33.5% | 11.0% | 28.2% | −13.9 pts | −14.7 pts |
| HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF Covered call on HACK, paying monthly | MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF Covered call on XLE, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Cybersecurity (HACK) | Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 12.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% (since launch on Jan 21, 2026) | 13.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +25.5% | −2.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +39.2% (since launch on Jan 21, 2026) | +12.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +53.1% | +47.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.9 pts | −35.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 240 days | 863 days |
| Net assets | $8m | $27m |
HAKY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, HAKY paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 25.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +39.2%. Cybersecurity (HACK) returned +53.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
MLPD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MLPD paid 13.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.0%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HAKY or MLPD?
- HAKY charges 0.65% a year and MLPD charges 0.60%, so MLPD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HAKY against MLPD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/haky-vs-mlpd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.