Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPIX vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

GPIX and TPAY both write options for income.

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF.

8.8%GPIX cash paid, 1 year
5.8%TPAY cash paid, 1 year
+17.0%GPIX total return, 1 year
+11.0%TPAY total return, 1 year
GPIXAbout even with SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%GPIX+17.0%8.8% of it arrived as cashabout even with SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%GPIX+17.0%8.8% cashabout even with SPY
TPAY0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%0.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GPIXOnly in TPAY
NVIDIA CORP 7.33%SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75%
APPLE INC 6.47%SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20%
ALPHABET INC 4.37%SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.90%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.39%
BROADCOM INC 2.80%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIX and TPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIXTPAYGPIXTPAYGPIXTPAY
3 months+2.6%+1.5%2.1%2.4%+0.3 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+16.6%+17.3%4.7%5.3%−1.4 pts−0.7 pts
1 year+17.0%not published8.8%not published+0.4 ptsnot published
Since launch+80.7%+11.0%30.5%5.8%−10.8 pts−0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIX and TPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
TPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerGoldman SachsRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.6%9.5%
Expense ratio0.29%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year8.8%5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+7.4%+4.9%
Total return, 1 year+17.0%+11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.8%
Ahead or behind+0.4 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1058 days212 days
Net assets$5.8bn$2m

GPIX in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

TPAY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GPIX or TPAY?
GPIX charges 0.29% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so GPIX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIX against TPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpix-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources