Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

GPIX vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 6.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GPIX and LAPR

Net assets: $6.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF, and $11m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April.

At a glance
8.8%
GPIX cash paid, 1 year
6.2%
LAPR cash paid, 1 year
+15.6%
GPIX total return, 1 year
+6.2%
LAPR total return, 1 year
GPIX · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 0.8 pts ahead of SPY
GPIX
+15.6%
SPY
+14.8%

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +6.2%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

GPIX

+15.6%

8.8% of it arrived as cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +6.2%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

GPIX

+15.6%

8.8% cash

0.8 pts ahead of SPY

8.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.8%, price +6.2%, total +15.6%, SPY +14.8%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LAPR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.6 pts behind VOO
LAPR
+6.2%
VOO
+14.8%

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

6.2% of it arrived as cash

8.6 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.6 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LAPR

+6.2%

8.6 pts behind VOO

6.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.2%, price −0.1%, total +6.2%, VOO +14.8%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GPIX costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; GPIX is far larger, $6.4bn against $11m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GPIX vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIXLAPR
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+6.2%
Price change, 1 yearrose 6.2%fell 0.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate57% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOO
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$6.4bn$11m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · GPIX scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score82.9GPIX56.6LAPR

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and LAPR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GPIX LAPR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GPIX
NVIDIA CORP 7.31%
APPLE INC 6.45%
ALPHABET INC 4.35%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.89%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.38%
BROADCOM INC 2.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.88%
Only in LAPR
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly
Strategy covered call buffer with income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.4% 6.7%
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.8% 6.2%
Price change, 1 year +6.2% −0.1%
Total return, 1 year +15.6% +6.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind +0.8 pts −8.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 57%
Age 3.0 years 2.6 years
Net assets, GPIX as of Nov 3, 2026 and LAPR as of Nov 4, 2026 $6.4bn $11m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: GPIX vs LAPR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowGPIXLAPRGPIXLAPRGPIXLAPR
3 months+0.9%+1.0%2.1%1.7%+1.0 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+6.0%+2.4%4.3%3.3%+1.0 pts−2.6 pts
1 year+15.6%+6.2%8.8%6.2%+0.9 pts−8.6 pts
3 years+73.9%–31.0%–−9.0 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: GPIX Oct 2023 · LAPR Apr 2024+82.5%+16.8%32.5%15.0%−10.2 pts−34.6 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LAPR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GPIX

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid monthly.

LAPR

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LAPR paid 6.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 57% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIX or LAPR?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.8% of its starting price in cash and LAPR paid 6.2%, so GPIX paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or LAPR?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +15.6% and LAPR +6.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, GPIX or LAPR?
GPIX charges 0.29% a year and LAPR charges 0.79%, so GPIX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GPIX against LAPR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpix-vs-lapr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.