Data as of .
GPIQ vs KYLD: which paid, and which earned it?
GPIQ and KYLD both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and KYLD hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIQ | KYLD |
|---|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 4.11% | 6.21% |
| INTEL CORP | 3.01% | 6.19% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.69% | 5.17% |
| APPLOVIN CORP | 0.74% | 5.32% |
| SHOPIFY INC | 0.52% | 3.43% |
| TERADYNE INC | 0.32% | 5.77% |
| Only in GPIQ | Only in KYLD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 7.48% | TREASURY BILL 12.96% |
| APPLE INC 6.59% | TREASURY BILL 11.01% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62% | Global X Silver Miners ETF 7.09% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.20% | VanEck Gold Miners ETF/USA 6.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 3.96% | Howmet Aerospace Inc 5.97% |
| ALPHABET INC 3.54% | BWX Technologies Inc 5.38% |
| TESLA INC 3.17% | Vistra Corp 4.71% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.78% | Reddit Inc 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | KYLD | GPIQ | KYLD | GPIQ | KYLD | |
| 3 months | −1.7% | −6.3% | 2.5% | 5.6% | +0.8 pts | −8.5 pts |
| 6 months | +20.5% | +24.4% | 5.9% | 14.1% | −3.7 pts | +6.4 pts |
| 1 year | +21.4% | not published | 11.0% | not published | −0.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +98.3% | +2.0% | 38.2% | 20.9% | −15.0 pts | −10.9 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | KYLD Kurv High Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | Kurv |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.5% | 25.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% | 20.9% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.3% | −20.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% | +2.0% (since launch on Oct 31, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +12.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −10.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 1058 days | 322 days |
| Net assets | $5.8bn | $49m |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
KYLD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 31, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, KYLD paid 20.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.6%, paid weekly. Kurv estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or KYLD?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and KYLD charges 1.00%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against KYLD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-kyld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.