Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GOOY vs OARK: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GOOY paid 44.8% of its price in cash against OARK’s 38.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

44.8%GOOY cash paid, 1 year
38.6%OARK cash paid, 1 year
+32.7%GOOY total return, 1 year
+7.2%OARK total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GOOY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GOOY 54.1OARK 11.29.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GOOY8.5 pts behind GOOGL · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
GOOGL+41.2%GOOY+32.7%44.8% of it arrived as cash8.5 pts behind GOOGLTotal return, distributions reinvestedGOOGL+41.2%GOOY+32.7%44.8% as cash8.5 pts behind GOOGL
OARK15.8 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%38.6% as cash15.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%15.8 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GOOY and OARK hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GOOY and OARK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGOOYOARK
TREASURY BILL23.75%37.81%
TREASURY BILL21.83%30.32%
TREASURY BILL22.86%18.55%
TREASURY BILL20.83%10.80%
TREASURY BILL10.73%2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GOOY and OARK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GOOYOARKGOOYOARKGOOYOARK
3 months−5.0%+5.1%7.3%9.6%+0.8 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+9.0%+15.3%20.8%22.6%−3.1 pts−5.4 pts
1 year+32.7%+7.2%44.8%38.6%−8.5 pts−15.8 pts
3 years+79.5%+48.6%81.3%82.9%−73.0 pts−46.5 pts
Since launch+80.5%+53.5%82.1%89.2%−77.2 pts−99.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GOOY and OARK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GOOY
YieldMax(R) GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on GOOGL, paying weekly
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkAlphabet (GOOGL)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized23.2%37.1%
Expense ratio1.14%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year44.8%38.6%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%−33.3%
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+7.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+41.2%+23.0%
Ahead or behind−8.5 pts−15.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate85%39%
Age1141 days1388 days

GOOY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GOOY paid 44.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.7%. Alphabet (GOOGL) returned +41.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.5 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 85% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GOOY or OARK?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GOOY paid 44.8% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 38.6%, so GOOY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GOOY or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, GOOY returned +32.7% and OARK returned +7.2% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so GOOY returned more.
Which is cheaper, GOOY or OARK?
GOOY charges 1.14% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GOOY against OARK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GOOY against OARK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gooy-vs-oark Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources