Data as of .
FGSI vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against FGSI’s 8.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and XRMI hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FGSI | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | 2.45% | 5.63% |
| NVIDIA Corporation | 2.15% | 8.27% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 2.03% | 2.26% |
| Broadcom Inc. | 1.90% | 2.61% |
| Eli Lilly and Company | 1.93% | 1.42% |
| Mastercard Incorporated | 2.03% | 0.69% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) | 2.63% | 0.62% |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation | 1.85% | 0.61% |
| Netflix, Inc. | 2.04% | 0.46% |
| Marvell Technology, Inc. | 2.53% | 0.33% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. | 2.32% | 0.32% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings Plc | 2.15% | 0.31% |
| Only in FGSI | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| United Therapeutics Corporation 1.80% | APPLE INC 7.54% |
| Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. 1.67% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.82% |
| US Dollar 1.13% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15% |
| 2026-09-25 S&P 500® Mini Index C 765 -0.17% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 1.76% | |
| TESLA INC 1.58% | |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46% | |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGSI | XRMI | FGSI | XRMI | FGSI | XRMI | |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +3.5% | 2.1% | 3.0% | +0.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +10.0% | +8.9% | 4.4% | 6.3% | −8.0 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +5.3% | +10.3% | 8.1% | 12.1% | −11.3 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +27.2% | not published | 33.3% | not published | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +11.9% | +17.0% | 9.8% | 43.8% | −14.3 pts | −66.1 pts |
| FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.6% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.1% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.2% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.3% | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.3 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 449 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $60m |
FGSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FGSI or XRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or XRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +5.3% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XRMI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FGSI or XRMI?
- FGSI charges 0.85% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.