Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APRH vs FGSI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FGSI paid 8.1% of its price in cash against APRH’s 5.9%, though APRH returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April and FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF.

5.9%APRH cash paid, 1 year
8.1%FGSI cash paid, 1 year
+6.5%APRH total return, 1 year
+5.3%FGSI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: APRH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

APRH 46FGSI 333.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APRH10.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%APRH+6.5%5.9% of it arrived as cash10.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%APRH+6.5%10.1 pts behind SPY
FGSI11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%8.1% of it arrived as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%11.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APRH and FGSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in APRHOnly in FGSI
TREASURY BILL 94.03%Newmont Corporation 2.70%
TREASURY BILL 2.00%Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63%
TREASURY BILL 1.99%Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53%
TREASURY BILL 1.98%Microsoft Corporation 2.45%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32%
DexCom, Inc. 2.28%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22%
Target Corporation 2.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APRH and FGSI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APRHFGSIAPRHFGSIAPRHFGSI
3 months+1.3%+2.4%2.1%2.1%−0.9 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+5.1%+10.0%3.7%4.4%−12.9 pts−8.0 pts
1 year+6.5%+5.3%5.9%8.1%−10.1 pts−11.3 pts
3 years+22.5%not published19.7%not published−55.9 ptsnot published
Since launch+28.3%+11.9%22.2%9.8%−65.3 pts−14.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APRH and FGSI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
FGSI
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorFirst Trust
Strategydefined incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.3%8.6%
Expense ratio0.79%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year5.9%8.1%
Price change, 1 year+0.3%−3.2%
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+5.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−10.1 pts−11.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1264 days449 days
Net assets$25m$2m

APRH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid quarterly.

FGSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APRH or FGSI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRH paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and FGSI paid 8.1%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRH or FGSI?
With every distribution reinvested, APRH returned +6.5% and FGSI returned +5.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so APRH returned more.
Which is cheaper, APRH or FGSI?
APRH charges 0.79% a year and FGSI charges 0.85%, so APRH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APRH against FGSI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRH against FGSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-fgsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources