Which paid more, FEPI or QRMI?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.6%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or QRMI?

With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +2.9% and QRMI +3.7% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, FEPI or QRMI?

FEPI charges 0.65% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

FEPI vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its price in cash against QRMI’s 11.6%, though QRMI returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FEPI and QRMI

Net assets: $679m on Nov 3, 2026 for REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, and $15m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF.

FEPI on its own →QRMI on its own →

At a glance

22.1%

FEPI cash paid, 1 year

11.6%

QRMI cash paid, 1 year

+2.9%

FEPI total return, 1 year

+3.7%

QRMI total return, 1 year

FEPI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

FEPI

+2.9%

none

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEPI

+2.9%

22.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FEPI over 1 year: paid 22.1%, price −19.3%, total +2.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QRMI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.6 pts behind QQQ

QRMI

+3.7%

QQQ

+12.3%

8.6 pts behind QQQ

QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QRMI

+3.7%

11.6% as cash

8.6 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.6 pts behind QQQ

QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QRMI

+3.7%

8.6 pts behind QQQ

11.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QRMI over 1 year: paid 11.6%, price −8.1%, total +3.7%, QQQ +12.3%, −8.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QRMI costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; FEPI is far larger, $744m against $15m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FEPI vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	FEPI	QRMI
Paid and earned
Measure	FEPI	QRMI
Total return, 1 year	+2.9%	+3.7%
Price change, 1 year	fell 19.3%	fell 8.1%
Return of capital, issuer estimate		100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	FEPI	QRMI
Benchmark	not published	Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Measure	FEPI	QRMI
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$744m	$15m
Holdings
Measure	FEPI	QRMI
Holdings in common	48%

Method

What they share

48%

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and QRMI hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

48% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FEPI QRMI

APPLE INC. 6.90% 7.60%

NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.68% 8.14%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.88% 4.29%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.23% 5.78%

AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.21% 4.90%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 6.04% 3.60%

ALPHABET INC. 7.00% 3.48%

BROADCOM INC. 6.95% 3.10%

META PLATFORMS, INC. 4.25% 2.77%

TESLA, INC. 4.22% 2.60%

INTEL CORPORATION 4.10% 2.10%

NETFLIX, INC. 4.21% 1.40%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FEPI

ORACLE CORPORATION 4.23%

Only in QRMI

ALPHABET INC. 3.26%

WALMART INC. 2.51%

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 2.12%

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 1.96%

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.86%

LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 1.70%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. 1.25%

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 1.17%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF · Covered call, paying weekly QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying monthly

Issuer REX Global X

Strategy covered call option income

Benchmark none Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)

Pays weekly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 24.9% 12.2%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.60%

Cash paid, 1 year 22.1% 11.6%

Price change, 1 year −19.3% −8.1%

Total return, 1 year +2.9% +3.7%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +12.3%

Ahead or behind not available −8.6 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%

Age 3.1 years 5.2 years

Net assets, FEPI as of Nov 3, 2026 and QRMI as of Oct 12, 2026 $679m $15m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FEPI vs QRMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	FEPI	QRMI	FEPI	QRMI	FEPI	QRMI
3 months	−1.5%	−0.1%	6.4%	3.0%	not measured	+3.4 pts
6 months	−2.4%	+1.0%	11.2%	5.9%	not measured	+1.3 pts
1 year	+2.9%	+3.7%	22.1%	11.6%	not measured	−8.6 pts
3 years	+55.6%	+25.7%	69.1%	35.0%	not measured	−65.7 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FEPI Oct 2023 · QRMI Aug 2021	+56.7%	+8.5%	69.6%	42.0%	not measured	−83.2 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

FEPI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.9%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.

QRMI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QRMI paid 11.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.2%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or QRMI?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FEPI paid 22.1% of its starting price in cash and QRMI paid 11.6%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or QRMI?: With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +2.9% and QRMI +3.7% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or QRMI?: FEPI charges 0.65% a year and QRMI charges 0.60%, so QRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FEPI vs QDTY FEPI vs ACQQ FEPI vs KIQQ FEPI vs QQQY QRMI vs YYY QRMI vs SIXH QRMI vs ULTY QRMI vs SDVD

Where to next

Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →FEPI on its own →QRMI on its own →FEPI dividend history →FEPI holdings →QRMI dividend history →QRMI holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FEPI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FEPI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

REX page for FEPI ↗

QRMI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QRMI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

QRMI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for QRMI ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FEPI against QRMI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-qrmi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.