Data as of .
FEPI vs KHPI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against KHPI’s 9.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: KHPI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and KHPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FEPI | Only in KHPI |
|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91% | |
| ALPHABET INC. 8.83% | |
| BROADCOM INC. 8.05% | |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76% | |
| TESLA, INC. 7.47% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 5.24% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEPI | KHPI | FEPI | KHPI | FEPI | KHPI | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +1.9% | 6.0% | 2.2% | +5.4 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +17.2% | +11.3% | 12.8% | 4.7% | −7.1 pts | −6.8 pts |
| 1 year | +15.7% | +11.0% | 23.4% | 9.1% | −6.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Since launch | +69.0% | +24.6% | 66.8% | 18.4% | −28.5 pts | −17.7 pts |
| FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | KHPI Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Kensington |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 24.9% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 23.4% | 9.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.0% | +1.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +11.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1073 days | 743 days |
| Net assets | $713m | $401m |
FEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.
KHPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KHPI paid 9.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FEPI or KHPI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and KHPI paid 9.1%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or KHPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and KHPI returned +11.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FEPI or KHPI?
- FEPI charges 0.65% a year and KHPI charges 0.98%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against KHPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-khpi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.