Data as of .
FDND vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FDND paid 7.1% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, though XIJN returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIJN scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDND and XIJN hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDND | XIJN |
|---|---|---|
| US Dollar | 0.85% | 0.76% |
| Only in FDND | Only in XIJN |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 100.51% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98% | 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® 3.76% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56% |
| Netflix, Inc. 5.90% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 4.36% | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 04/15/2027 0.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDND | XIJN | FDND | XIJN | FDND | XIJN | |
| 3 months | +8.9% | +1.8% | 2.0% | 1.1% | +8.5 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +18.8% | +4.0% | 4.3% | 3.5% | +4.8 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | −0.6% | +6.2% | 7.1% | 6.9% | −14.1 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Since launch | +34.3% | +16.6% | 20.4% | 14.7% | −0.5 pts | −27.4 pts |
| FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | XIJN FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 7.8% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.2% | −0.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.6% | +6.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.1 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 911 days | 816 days |
| Net assets | $10m | $53m |
FDND in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.
XIJN in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FDND or XIJN?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so FDND paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or XIJN?
- With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XIJN returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FDND or XIJN?
- FDND charges 0.75% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.