Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
EHY vs XBCI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
EHY and XBCI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EHY and XBCI
Net assets: $4.8m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF, and $238m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF.
12.2 pts behind Ether
EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Ether
−24.7%
EHY
−36.9%
12.2 pts behind Ether
Total return, distributions reinvested
12.2 pts behind Ether
EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Ether
−24.7%
EHY
−36.9%
12.2 pts behind Ether
30.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. EHY over 1 year: paid 30.4%, price −62.2%, total −36.9%, Ether −24.7%, −12.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
26.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
EHY costs 0.23 points a year less; XBCI is far larger, $238m against $4.7m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | EHY | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −36.9% | not published |
| Price change | fell 62.2% (1 year) | fell 27.6% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 99% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 97% of the Oct 9, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Ether (ETH-USD) | NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF, measured through BTCI |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $4.7m | $238m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EHY and XBCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | EHY | XBCI | EHY | XBCI | EHY | XBCI |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +24.3% | 12.9% | 11.7% | −24.4 pts | +6.8 pts |
| 6 months | −23.1% | −9.9% | 17.6% | 14.6% | −26.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | −36.9% | – | 30.4% | – | −12.3 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: EHY Oct 2025 · XBCI Feb 2026 | −52.0% | +0.5% | 23.2% | 26.3% | −7.7 pts | −0.4 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
EHY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, EHY paid 30.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 62.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −36.9%. Ether (ETH-USD) returned −24.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.3%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XBCI
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XBCI paid 26.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EHY against XBCI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehy-vs-xbci
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). EHY against XBCI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehy-vs-xbci
[EHY against XBCI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehy-vs-xbci)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.