Data as of .
XBCI vs YETH: which paid, and which earned it?
XBCI and YETH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XBCI and YETH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XBCI | Only in YETH |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 79.38% | United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 94.47% |
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 20.62% | ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 C 6.81% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 5.03% | |
| ETHA 09/25/2026 21.02 C -1.04% | |
| ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 P -5.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XBCI | YETH | XBCI | YETH | XBCI | YETH | |
| 3 months | +32.2% | +28.9% | 10.1% | 11.4% | +3.0 pts | −25.8 pts |
| 6 months | +14.7% | +7.6% | 18.0% | 20.5% | −1.0 pts | −16.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −39.9% | not published | 29.0% | not published | +2.8 pts |
| Since launch | +3.7% | −29.8% | 21.3% | 68.4% | −2.5 pts | −36.9 pts |
| XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | YETH Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Roundhill |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Ether (ETHA) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 38.0% | 36.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 21.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | 29.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | −20.3% | −66.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | −39.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +6.3% | −42.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.5 pts | +2.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 95% | not published |
| Age | 227 days | 744 days |
| Net assets | $179m | $67m |
XBCI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XBCI paid 21.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
YETH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YETH paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 66.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −39.9%. Ether (ETHA) returned −42.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.6%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, XBCI or YETH?
- XBCI charges 0.98% a year and YETH charges 0.96%, so YETH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XBCI against YETH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-yeth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.