Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BITA vs YETH: which paid, and which earned it?

BITA and YETH both write options for income.

iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF.

3.7%BITA cash paid, 1 year
29.0%YETH cash paid, 1 year
+21.0%BITA total return, 1 year
−39.9%YETH total return, 1 year
BITA2.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+23.8%BITA+21.0%2.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+23.8%BITA+21.0%2.8 pts behind IBIT
YETH2.8 pts ahead of ETHA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
ETHA−42.6%YETH−39.9%2.8 pts ahead of ETHATotal return, distributions reinvestedETHA−42.6%YETH−39.9%2.8 pts ahead of ETHA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BITA and YETH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BITAOnly in YETH
BITCOIN 67.78%United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 94.47%
ISHARES BITCOIN TRUST ETF CL1 32.88%ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 C 6.81%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.07%First American Government Obligations Fu 5.03%
SEP26 IBIT C @ 45.000000 -0.04%ETHA 09/25/2026 21.02 C -1.04%
OCT26 IBIT C @ 45.000000 -0.13%ETHA 10/16/2026 19.72 P -5.27%
OCT26 IBIT C @ 44.000000 -0.15%
SEP26 IBIT C @ 41.000000 -0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BITA and YETH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BITAYETHBITAYETHBITAYETH
3 months+24.6%+28.9%3.9%11.4%−4.6 pts−25.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+7.6%not published20.5%not published−16.2 pts
1 yearnot published−39.9%not published29.0%not published+2.8 pts
Since launch+21.0%−29.8%3.7%68.4%−2.8 pts−36.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BITA and YETH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITA
iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
YETH
Roundhill Ether Covered Call Strategy ETF
Covered call on ETHA, paying weekly
IssueriSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Ether (ETHA)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized12.8%36.6%
Expense rationot published0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year3.7% (since launch on Jun 16, 2026)29.0%
Price change, 1 year+16.6%−66.4%
Total return, 1 year+21.0% (since launch on Jun 16, 2026)−39.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.8%−42.6%
Ahead or behind−2.8 pts+2.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age94 days744 days
Net assets$87m$67m

BITA in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 16, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BITA paid 3.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.0%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +23.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.8%, paid monthly.

YETH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YETH paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 66.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −39.9%. Ether (ETHA) returned −42.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.6%, paid weekly.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITA against YETH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITA against YETH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bita-vs-yeth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources