Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
EHCC vs XBCI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
EHCC and XBCI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EHCC and XBCI
Net assets: $1.4m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF, and $238m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF.
10.1 pts behind Ether
EHCC since launch: paid 17.4%, price −11.6%, total +7.0%, Ether +17.1%, −10.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Ether
+17.1%
EHCC
+7.0%
17.4% of it arrived as cash
10.1 pts behind Ether
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.1 pts behind Ether
EHCC since launch: paid 17.4%, price −11.6%, total +7.0%, Ether +17.1%, −10.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Ether
+17.1%
EHCC
+7.0%
10.1 pts behind Ether
17.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. EHCC since launch: paid 17.4%, price −11.6%, total +7.0%, Ether +17.1%, −10.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with BTCI
XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BTCI
+0.9%
XBCI
+0.5%
about even with BTCI
26.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XBCI since launch: paid 26.3%, price −27.6%, total +0.5%, BTCI +0.9%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
EHCC costs 0.23 points a year less; XBCI is far larger, $236m against $1.4m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | EHCC | XBCI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | fell 11.6% (since Apr 2, 2026) | fell 27.6% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment | 97% of the Oct 9, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Ether (ETH-USD) | NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF, measured through BTCI |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $1.4m | $236m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 29 weekly returnsFrom Apr 2026 to Oct 2026, XBCI returned more: −2.3% to −6.4%. EHCC fell less at its worst: −30.2% to −33.8%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EHCC | XBCI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −6.4% | −2.3% | XBCI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −22.2% | −20.1% | XBCI (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −30.2% | −33.8% | EHCC | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 29 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EHCC and XBCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | EHCC | XBCI | EHCC | XBCI | EHCC | XBCI |
| 3 months | +17.5% | +24.3% | 8.8% | 11.7% | −8.8 pts | +6.8 pts |
| 6 months | −2.9% | −9.9% | 13.3% | 14.6% | −5.9 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: EHCC Apr 2026 · XBCI Feb 2026 | +7.0% | +0.5% | 17.4% | 26.3% | −10.1 pts | −0.4 pts |
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for EHCC or XBCI.
EHCC
Over the period from its first trade on Apr 2, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, EHCC paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.0%. Ether (ETH-USD) returned +17.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.6%, paid weekly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XBCI
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XBCI paid 26.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 97% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EHCC against XBCI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehcc-vs-xbci
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). EHCC against XBCI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehcc-vs-xbci
[EHCC against XBCI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ehcc-vs-xbci)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.