Data as of .
DYLG vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DYLG | Only in QDTE |
|---|---|
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88% | NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 9.35% | QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.70% | NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% |
| AMGEN INC 4.46% | QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% |
| TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33% | First American Government Obligations Fu 3.90% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | QDTE | DYLG | QDTE | DYLG | QDTE | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | −0.9% | 0.8% | 7.6% | +1.5 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +19.7% | 2.1% | 16.2% | −0.9 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +21.1% | 9.5% | 36.1% | +0.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | not published | 30.8% | not published | −9.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +59.9% | 30.7% | 74.1% | −8.3 pts | −4.3 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 20.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 36.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | −19.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +21.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | not published |
| Age | 1150 days | 925 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $967m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or QDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or QDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and QDTE returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or QDTE?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.