Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FDND vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against FDND’s 7.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

7.1%FDND cash paid, 1 year
36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
−0.6%FDND total return, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FDND 21.4QDTE 39.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FDND14.1 pts behind DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIA
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDND and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FDNDOnly in QDTE
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12%NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%
Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98%QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66%NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%
Netflix, Inc. 5.90%QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65%First American Government Obligations Fu 3.90%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FDND and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FDNDQDTEFDNDQDTEFDNDQDTE
3 months+8.9%−0.9%2.0%7.6%+8.5 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+18.8%+19.7%4.3%16.2%+4.8 pts−4.5 pts
1 year−0.6%+21.1%7.1%36.1%−14.1 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch+34.3%+59.9%20.4%74.1%−0.5 pts−4.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FDND and QDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategyoption income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized7.8%20.8%
Expense ratio0.75%0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year7.1%36.1%
Price change, 1 year−8.2%−19.2%
Total return, 1 year−0.6%+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−14.1 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age911 days925 days
Net assets$10m$967m

FDND in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FDND or QDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and QDTE returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, FDND or QDTE?
FDND charges 0.75% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDND against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources