Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DUBS vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DUBS and YMAG
Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $268m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs.
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
DUBS
+18.6%
2.3% cash
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
DUBS
+18.6%
3.8 pts ahead of SPY
2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
33.4% of it arrived as cash
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
33.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
DUBS costs 0.94 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.8 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DUBS | YMAG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +18.6% | +5.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 16.0% | fell 29.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | 11% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | its own holdings |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 1.34% |
| Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and YMAG as of Nov 3, 2026 | $398m | $268m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Feb 9, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026 · 142 weekly returnsFrom Feb 2024 to Oct 2026, DUBS returned slightly more: +61.3% to +59.6%. DUBS swung less: 13.8% to 19.5%. DUBS fell less at its worst: −16.4% to −23.7%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DUBS | YMAG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +61.3% | +59.6% | DUBS (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +19.1% | +18.7% | DUBS (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +51.1% | −48.9% | DUBS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 13.8% | 19.5% | DUBS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.1% | 13.0% | DUBS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −16.4% | −23.7% | DUBS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 1.02 | 0.75 | DUBS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.56 | 1.13 | DUBS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 1.17 | 0.79 | DUBS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 142 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DUBS | YMAG | DUBS | YMAG | DUBS | YMAG |
| 3 months | +0.6% | +3.3% | 0.6% | 9.1% | +0.7 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +6.7% | +1.9% | 1.1% | 18.1% | +1.7 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | +18.6% | +5.8% | 2.3% | 33.4% | +3.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 3 years | +85.1% | – | 9.9% | – | +2.2 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · YMAG Jan 2024 | +86.4% | +70.3% | 10.2% | 91.7% | +3.2 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DUBS
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
YMAG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. YMAG's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Nov 2, 2026) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 11% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUBS against YMAG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ymag
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DUBS against YMAG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ymag
[DUBS against YMAG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ymag)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.