Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DUBS vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ULTY paid 44.9% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF.

2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
44.9%ULTY cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year
−7.8%ULTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DUBS 94ULTY 3.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY
ULTY24.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and ULTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DUBSOnly in ULTY
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.23%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%MercadoLibre Inc 4.99%
TREASURY BILL 0.11%Lumentum Holdings Inc 4.75%
Strategy Inc 4.66%
Comfort Systems USA Inc 4.61%
Alphabet Inc 4.39%
Lam Research Corp 4.34%
Coherent Corp 4.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DUBS and ULTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DUBSULTYDUBSULTYDUBSULTY
3 months+3.2%−1.1%0.5%13.7%+1.0 pts−3.3 pts
6 months+20.3%+14.0%1.2%30.1%+2.3 pts−4.0 pts
1 year+20.3%−7.8%2.3%44.9%+3.7 pts−24.3 pts
3 years+80.1%not published9.1%not published+1.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+84.4%+10.7%9.3%86.9%+2.4 pts−44.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DUBS and ULTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerAptusYieldMax
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysquarterlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized2.1%59.8%
Expense ratio0.40%1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year2.3%44.9%
Price change, 1 year+17.6%−54.1%
Total return, 1 year+20.3%−7.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+3.7 pts−24.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1192 days932 days
Net assets$353m$721m

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ULTY paid 44.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 24.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or ULTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 44.9%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or ULTY?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +20.3% and ULTY returned −7.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or ULTY?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DUBS against ULTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against ULTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources