Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

DUBS vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DUBS and TCAL

Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $324m on Nov 3, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF.

At a glance
2.3%
DUBS cash paid, 1 year
11.4%
TCAL cash paid, 1 year
+18.6%
DUBS total return, 1 year
+11.2%
TCAL total return, 1 year
DUBS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.8 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS
+18.6%
SPY
+14.8%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

2.3% cash

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TCAL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.4 pts behind its own stocks
TCAL
+11.2%
Own
+14.6%

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own stocks

+14.6%

TCAL

+11.2%

11.4% of it arrived as cash

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own stocks

+14.6%

TCAL

+11.2%

11.4% cash

3.4 pts behind its own stocks

11.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TCAL over 1 year: paid 11.4%, price −1.2%, total +11.2%, its own stocks +14.6%, −3.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

TCAL costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.4 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DUBS vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDUBSTCAL
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+11.2%
Price change, 1 yearrose 16.0%fell 1.2%
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYits own stocks
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.34%
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and TCAL as of Nov 3, 2026$398m$324m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · DUBS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score97.9DUBS54.8TCAL

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Apr 4, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 82 weekly returns
DUBS TCAL
Return
Total return edge DUBS +56.9% +15.2%
Annualized edge DUBS +33.1% +9.4%
Price return edge DUBS +51.7% −3.8%
Risk
Volatility edge TCAL 13.1% 8.5%
Max drawdown edge TCAL (slight) −7.6% −7.0%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge DUBS 1.95 0.64
Sortino edge DUBS 3.77 0.95
Calmar edge DUBS 4.37 1.34
Reading

From Apr 2025 to Oct 2026, DUBS returned more: +56.9% to +15.2%. TCAL swung less: 8.5% to 13.1%. TCAL fell slightly less at its worst: −7.0% to −7.6%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DUBS vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureDUBSTCALEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+56.9%+15.2%DUBSPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+33.1%+9.4%DUBSTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+51.7%−3.8%DUBSPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility13.1%8.5%TCALSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation6.8%5.7%TCALLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−7.6%−7.0%TCAL (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.950.64DUBSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino3.770.95DUBSReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar4.371.34DUBSAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 82 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and TCAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DUBS TCAL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in DUBS
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 73.21%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 24.71%
Only in TCAL
DANAHER CORP 2.02%
WATERS CORP 1.99%
VERALTO CORP 1.89%
WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.82%
YUM BRANDS INC 1.73%
MCDONALD S CORP 1.71%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.71%
LINDE PLC 1.65%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF · Option income on SPY, paying quarterly TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF · Covered call on its own stocks, paying monthly
Strategy option income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) TCAL's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 2.2% 13.0%
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.34%
Cash paid, 1 year 2.3% 11.4%
Price change, 1 year +16.0% −1.2%
Total return, 1 year +18.6% +11.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.6%
Ahead or behind +3.8 pts −3.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 71% not published
Age 3.4 years 1.6 years
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and TCAL as of Nov 3, 2026 $398m $324m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DUBS vs TCAL: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDUBSTCALDUBSTCALDUBSTCAL
3 months+0.6%+5.3%0.6%2.6%+0.7 pts−1.8 pts
6 months+6.7%+12.3%1.1%6.3%+1.7 pts−0.9 pts
1 year+18.6%+11.2%2.3%11.4%+3.8 pts−3.5 pts
3 years+85.1%–9.9%–+2.2 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · TCAL Mar 2025+86.4%+12.0%10.2%16.9%+3.2 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

TCAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DUBS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

TCAL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. TCAL's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jun 30, 2026) returned +14.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or TCAL?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and TCAL paid 11.4%, so TCAL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or TCAL?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and TCAL +11.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or TCAL?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and TCAL charges 0.34%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUBS against TCAL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-tcal

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.