Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CVRD vs DUBS: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year CVRD paid 7.4% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

Madison Covered Call ETF and Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF.

7.4%CVRD cash paid, 1 year
2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
+5.6%CVRD total return, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

CVRD 35.5DUBS 943.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CVRD11 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%7.4% as cash11 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%11 pts behind SPY
DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CVRD and DUBS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CVRDOnly in DUBS
Palo Alto Networks Inc 4.84%State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 4.58%BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%
Danaher Corp 4.32%TREASURY BILL 0.11%
Amazon.com Inc 4.06%
Agilent Technologies Inc 3.98%
Microsoft Corp 3.88%
Visa Inc 3.68%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CVRD and DUBS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CVRDDUBSCVRDDUBSCVRDDUBS
3 months+4.0%+3.2%1.7%0.5%+1.7 pts+1.0 pts
6 months+5.7%+20.3%3.3%1.2%−12.3 pts+2.3 pts
1 year+5.6%+20.3%7.4%2.3%−11.0 pts+3.7 pts
3 years+19.5%+80.1%25.9%9.1%−58.9 pts+1.7 pts
Since launch+21.1%+84.4%26.3%9.3%−59.8 pts+2.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CVRD and DUBS on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying quarterly
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerMadisonAptus
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized6.5%2.1%
Expense ratio0.92%0.40%
Cash paid, 1 year7.4%2.3%
Price change, 1 year−2.2%+17.6%
Total return, 1 year+5.6%+20.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.0 pts+3.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1123 days1192 days
Net assets$32m$353m

CVRD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CVRD or DUBS?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting price in cash and DUBS paid 2.3%, so CVRD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CVRD or DUBS?
With every distribution reinvested, CVRD returned +5.6% and DUBS returned +20.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
Which is cheaper, CVRD or DUBS?
CVRD charges 0.92% a year and DUBS charges 0.40%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CVRD against DUBS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CVRD against DUBS, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-dubs Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources