Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
DUBS vs INK: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
INK costs 0.05 points a year less; DUBS is far larger, $469m against $5.3m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DUBS | INK |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.2% | not published |
| Price change | rose 12.7% (1 year) | fell 1.2% (since Nov 4, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | not published |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $469m | $5.3m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
3.2 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +12.7%, total +15.2%, SPY +12.0%, +3.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
DUBS
+15.2%
2.3% cash
3.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.2 pts ahead of SPY
DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +12.7%, total +15.2%, SPY +12.0%, +3.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
DUBS
+15.2%
3.2 pts ahead of SPY
2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +12.7%, total +15.2%, SPY +12.0%, +3.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DUBS | INK | DUBS | INK | DUBS | INK |
| 3 months | −1.9% | – | 0.5% | – | +0.6 pts | – |
| 6 months | +3.1% | – | 1.1% | – | +1.4 pts | – |
| 1 year | +15.2% | – | 2.3% | – | +3.3 pts | – |
| 3 years | +80.4% | – | 9.8% | – | +2.1 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · INK Nov 2026 | +83.6% | −1.2% | 10.2% | 0.0% | +2.7 pts | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
DUBS
Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
INK
Over the period from its first trade on Nov 4, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, INK paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.2%.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUBS against INK, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ink
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). DUBS against INK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ink
[DUBS against INK (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-ink)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
DUBS and INK both write options for income.