Data as of .
DOGG vs TCAL: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year TCAL paid 11.4% of its price in cash against DOGG’s 9.6%, though DOGG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and TCAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DOGG | TCAL |
|---|---|---|
| Merck & Co., Inc. | 7.18% | 0.39% |
| Only in DOGG | Only in TCAL |
|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94% | DANAHER CORP 2.01% |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47% | WATERS CORP 1.97% |
| Amgen Inc. 6.33% | VERALTO CORP 1.87% |
| Chevron Corporation 5.81% | WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80% |
| Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55% | YUM BRANDS INC 1.72% |
| The Coca-Cola Company 5.47% | MCDONALD S CORP 1.70% |
| McDonald's Corporation 4.92% | VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. 4.78% | LINDE PLC 1.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGG | TCAL | DOGG | TCAL | DOGG | TCAL | |
| 3 months | +2.5% | +4.2% | 2.3% | 3.5% | +2.1 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +3.9% | +5.3% | 4.5% | 6.3% | −10.1 pts | −12.7 pts |
| 1 year | +18.1% | +3.0% | 9.6% | 11.4% | +4.6 pts | −13.5 pts |
| 3 years | +40.2% | not published | 28.0% | not published | −16.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +3.9% | 30.9% | 15.2% | −17.9 pts | −32.7 pts |
| DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | T. Rowe Price |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 9.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.6% | 11.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | −8.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.1% | +3.0% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.6 pts | −13.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1240 days | 540 days |
| Net assets | $87m | $276m |
DOGG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
TCAL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DOGG or TCAL?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and TCAL paid 11.4%, so TCAL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or TCAL?
- With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and TCAL returned +3.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DOGG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DOGG or TCAL?
- DOGG charges 0.75% a year and TCAL charges 0.34%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against TCAL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-tcal Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.