Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TCAL vs XIJN: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year TCAL paid 11.4% of its price in cash against XIJN’s 6.9%, though XIJN returned more with it reinvested.

T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June.

11.4%TCAL cash paid, 1 year
6.9%XIJN cash paid, 1 year
+3.0%TCAL total return, 1 year
+6.2%XIJN total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XIJN scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

TCAL 21.9XIJN 39.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TCAL13.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%11.4% as cash13.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%13.5 pts behind SPY
XIJN10.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XIJN+6.2%6.9% of it arrived as cash10.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XIJN+6.2%10.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TCAL and XIJN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in TCALOnly in XIJN
DANAHER CORP 2.01%2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07 100.51%
WATERS CORP 1.97%2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 746.73 3.76%
VERALTO CORP 1.87%US Dollar 0.76%
WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.56%
YUM BRANDS INC 1.72%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.56%
MCDONALD S CORP 1.70%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.55%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.55%
LINDE PLC 1.63%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

TCAL and XIJN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
TCALXIJNTCALXIJNTCALXIJN
3 months+4.2%+1.8%3.5%1.1%+1.9 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+5.3%+4.0%6.3%3.5%−12.7 pts−14.0 pts
1 year+3.0%+6.2%11.4%6.9%−13.5 pts−10.3 pts
Since launch+3.9%+16.6%15.2%14.7%−32.7 pts−27.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TCAL and XIJN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XIJN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - June
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerT. Rowe PriceFirst Trust
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.4%6.7%
Expense ratio0.34%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year11.4%6.9%
Price change, 1 year−8.6%−0.9%
Total return, 1 year+3.0%+6.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−13.5 pts−10.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age540 days816 days
Net assets$276m$53m

TCAL in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.

XIJN in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIJN paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, TCAL or XIJN?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting price in cash and XIJN paid 6.9%, so TCAL paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, TCAL or XIJN?
With every distribution reinvested, TCAL returned +3.0% and XIJN returned +6.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XIJN returned more.
Which is cheaper, TCAL or XIJN?
TCAL charges 0.34% a year and XIJN charges 0.85%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TCAL against XIJN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TCAL against XIJN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tcal-vs-xijn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources