Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DIVO vs MSFO: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its price in cash against DIVO’s 6.6%, though DIVO returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DIVO and MSFO
Net assets: $8.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF, and $100m on Oct 27, 2026 for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF.
0.9 pts behind SPY
DIVO over 1 year: paid 6.6%, price +5.5%, total +12.7%, SPY +13.6%, −0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
SPY
+13.6%
DIVO
+12.7%
6.6% of it arrived as cash
0.9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.9 pts behind SPY
DIVO over 1 year: paid 6.6%, price +5.5%, total +12.7%, SPY +13.6%, −0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
SPY
+13.6%
DIVO
+12.7%
0.9 pts behind SPY
6.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DIVO over 1 year: paid 6.6%, price +5.5%, total +12.7%, SPY +13.6%, −0.9 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
Data to Oct 28, 2026.1.4 pts ahead of MSFT
MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
MSFT
−1.2%
MSFO
+0.2%
1.4 pts ahead of MSFT
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of MSFT
MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
MSFT
−1.2%
MSFO
+0.2%
1.4 pts ahead of MSFT
26.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
Data to Oct 28, 2026.Pair scorecard
DIVO costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.5 points; DIVO is far larger, $8.0bn against $100m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DIVO | MSFO |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | +0.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 5.5% | fell 30.2% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 68% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment | 89% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | Microsoft (MSFT) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 1.03% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $8.0bn | $100m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
DIVO among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company and 74 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
MSFO among the 74 income ETFs writing on a single company
A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. MSFO is a percentile among the 74 income ETFs writing on a single company, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 28, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and MSFO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 28, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DIVO | MSFO | DIVO | MSFO | DIVO | MSFO |
| 3 months | +4.2% | +31.5% | 1.2% | 12.5% | −1.9 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 6 months | +8.4% | +20.2% | 2.1% | 19.5% | −0.7 pts | −5.4 pts |
| 1 year | +12.7% | +0.2% | 6.6% | 26.1% | −0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 3 years | +66.6% | +57.1% | 19.9% | 79.1% | −28.4 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DIVO Dec 2016 · MSFO Aug 2023 | +224.0% | +64.8% | 73.2% | 83.2% | −76.6 pts | −3.4 pts |
DIVO and MSFO are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Income paid. DIVO paid 6.6% and MSFO 26.1% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 19.5 points.
- What each is measured against. DIVO is measured against S&P 500 through SPY and MSFO against Microsoft (MSFT).
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DIVO
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DIVO paid 6.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.7%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 68% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MSFO
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.2%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DIVO against MSFO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-msfo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DIVO against MSFO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-msfo
[DIVO against MSFO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/divo-vs-msfo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.