DACL vs MSR: which paid, and which earned it?

DACL and MSR both write options for income. REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF.

0.6%
DACL cash paid, since launch
5.2%
MSR cash paid, since launch
+0.5%
DACL total return, since launch
−33.6%
MSR total return, since launch
DACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.2 pts ahead of SPY
DACL
+0.5%
SPY
−1.7%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

MSR · since launch to Sep 30, 202616.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR
−33.6%
MSTR
−17.0%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +0.5%. MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowDACLMSRDACLMSRDACLMSR
3 monthsnot published+14.9%not published4.1%not published−49.0 pts
Since launch
DACL Aug 2026 · MSR May 2026
+0.5%−33.6%0.6%5.2%+2.2 pts−16.6 pts

DACL and MSR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DACL
REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
MSR
GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF · Autocallable on MSTR
Issuer REX GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MicroStrategy (MSTR)
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 6.6% 44.3%
Expense ratio 0.65% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.6% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026) 5.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.1% −38.4%
Total return, 1 year +0.5% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026) −33.6% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.7% −17.0%
Ahead or behind +2.2 pts −16.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 0%
Age 48 days 141 days
Net assets $4m $593,832

DACL and MSR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 13, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, DACL paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −1.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid periodically.

MSR in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MSR paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −33.6%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 44.3%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, DACL or MSR?
DACL charges 0.65% a year and MSR charges 1.07%, so DACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DACL against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dacl-vs-msr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.