Data as of .
CDPI vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?
CDPI and ULTY both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDPI | ULTY | CDPI | ULTY | CDPI | ULTY | |
| 3 months | not published | −1.1% | not published | 13.7% | not published | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +14.0% | not published | 30.1% | not published | −4.0 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −7.8% | not published | 44.9% | not published | −24.3 pts |
| Since launch | +0.5% | +10.7% | 0.7% | 86.9% | −4.1 pts | −44.1 pts |
| CDPI Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF Covered call on SCHD | ULTY YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Columbia | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.2% | 59.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 1.30% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | 44.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.2% | −54.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | −7.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +4.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.1 pts | −24.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 66 days | 932 days |
| Net assets | not published | $721m |
CDPI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.
ULTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ULTY paid 44.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 24.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CDPI or ULTY?
- CDPI charges 0.45% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against ULTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.